Re: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0

References	<lsq7lg$8tp$2@ger.gmane.org> <D1E2A969-19AB-42C7-A9C3-DF9DA3D6576D@gmail.com>
Date	2014-08-18 12:32 +1000
Subject	Re: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.13079.1408329145.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Redge @ Versalytics.com
<versalytics@gmail.com> wrote:
> Definitely a relief. After delving into Python only a few short months ago, everything I was reading suggested 2.x.x. When I switched to another book to continue with my studies, some of the code wasn't working ... welcome to 3.x.x.  Needless to say, I'm using 3.4.1 exclusively today unless something bizarre requires me to do otherwise.
>

Good move. You should be able to upgrade to 3.4.x safely, and 3.5 fairly safely.

Eventually, books about Python 3 will be the more easily found, and
you won't have this kind of confusion.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-18 12:32 +1000
  Re: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0 wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-08-18 01:30 -0700

csiph-web