Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #76444 > unrolled thread

Re: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0

Started by"Redge @ Versalytics.com" <versalytics@gmail.com>
First post2014-08-17 19:17 -0400
Last post2014-08-17 19:17 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0 "Redge @ Versalytics.com" <versalytics@gmail.com> - 2014-08-17 19:17 -0400

#76444 — Re: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0

From"Redge @ Versalytics.com" <versalytics@gmail.com>
Date2014-08-17 19:17 -0400
SubjectRe: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0
Message-ID<mailman.13078.1408328824.18130.python-list@python.org>
> On Aug 17, 2014, at 8:37 AM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> A blog from Nick Coghlan http://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2014/08/python-4000.html that should help put a few minds to rest.
> 
> -- 
> My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
> what you can do for our language.
> 
> Mark Lawrence
> 
> -- 
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Definitely a relief. After delving into Python only a few short months ago, everything I was reading suggested 2.x.x. When I switched to another book to continue with my studies, some of the code wasn't working ... welcome to 3.x.x.  Needless to say, I'm using 3.4.1 exclusively today unless something bizarre requires me to do otherwise.

Thanks for sharing.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web