Re: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0

References	<lsq7lg$8tp$2@ger.gmane.org>
From	"Redge @ Versalytics.com" <versalytics@gmail.com>
Subject	Re: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0
Date	2014-08-17 19:17 -0400
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.13078.1408328824.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

> On Aug 17, 2014, at 8:37 AM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> A blog from Nick Coghlan http://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2014/08/python-4000.html that should help put a few minds to rest.
> 
> -- 
> My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
> what you can do for our language.
> 
> Mark Lawrence
> 
> -- 
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Definitely a relief. After delving into Python only a few short months ago, everything I was reading suggested 2.x.x. When I switched to another book to continue with my studies, some of the code wasn't working ... welcome to 3.x.x.  Needless to say, I'm using 3.4.1 exclusively today unless something bizarre requires me to do otherwise.

Thanks for sharing.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0 "Redge @ Versalytics.com" <versalytics@gmail.com> - 2014-08-17 19:17 -0400

csiph-web