Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #38044 > unrolled thread

Re: CamelCase vs. all-lowercase package names

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: CamelCase vs. all-lowercase package names Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-02 02:28 +1100

#38044 — Re: CamelCase vs. all-lowercase package names

On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Rhubarb Sin <rhubarbsin@gmail.com> wrote:
> PEP-8 calls for "short, all-lowercase names" for packages:
>
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/#package-and-module-names
>
> On the other hand, The Hitchhiker's Guide to Packaging 1.0, under
> "Background," declares "come up with a CamelCase project name":
>
> http://guide.python-distribute.org/creation.html

That's the project name. In the next section, it refers to package
names, and in the example, uses the lowercased project name.

ChrisA

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web