Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #38044
| References | <CAM04Upt0HSYD5heSqACyfHZKYQ=CbobDEdQ5Zm-2St2qjUrcZA@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-02 02:28 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: CamelCase vs. all-lowercase package names |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1281.1359732539.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Rhubarb Sin <rhubarbsin@gmail.com> wrote: > PEP-8 calls for "short, all-lowercase names" for packages: > > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/#package-and-module-names > > On the other hand, The Hitchhiker's Guide to Packaging 1.0, under > "Background," declares "come up with a CamelCase project name": > > http://guide.python-distribute.org/creation.html That's the project name. In the next section, it refers to package names, and in the example, uses the lowercased project name. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: CamelCase vs. all-lowercase package names Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-02 02:28 +1100
csiph-web