Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #38044

Re: CamelCase vs. all-lowercase package names

References <CAM04Upt0HSYD5heSqACyfHZKYQ=CbobDEdQ5Zm-2St2qjUrcZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date 2013-02-02 02:28 +1100
Subject Re: CamelCase vs. all-lowercase package names
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1281.1359732539.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Rhubarb Sin <rhubarbsin@gmail.com> wrote:
> PEP-8 calls for "short, all-lowercase names" for packages:
>
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/#package-and-module-names
>
> On the other hand, The Hitchhiker's Guide to Packaging 1.0, under
> "Background," declares "come up with a CamelCase project name":
>
> http://guide.python-distribute.org/creation.html

That's the project name. In the next section, it refers to package
names, and in the example, uses the lowercased project name.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: CamelCase vs. all-lowercase package names Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-02 02:28 +1100

csiph-web