Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #73420 > unrolled thread

Re: Backport fix on #16611 to Python 2.7

Started byMakoto Kuwata <kwa@kuwata-lab.com>
First post2014-06-19 21:53 +0900
Last post2014-06-19 21:53 +0900
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Backport fix on #16611 to Python 2.7 Makoto Kuwata <kwa@kuwata-lab.com> - 2014-06-19 21:53 +0900

#73420 — Re: Backport fix on #16611 to Python 2.7

FromMakoto Kuwata <kwa@kuwata-lab.com>
Date2014-06-19 21:53 +0900
SubjectRe: Backport fix on #16611 to Python 2.7
Message-ID<mailman.11147.1403182717.18130.python-list@python.org>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Sorry, I failed to post reply:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Makoto Kuwata <kwa@kuwata-lab.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: Backport fix on #16611 to Python 2.7
To: Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>


On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:

>
> Do you have any plan to upgrade to 3.4, so you get *all* the bugfixes
> possible?
>
>
Please ask to Google. Google AppEngine doesn't support 3.4 yet.


On 6/17/2014 9:08 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:

> The simple answer is no.  The longer answer is, if you want to propose a
>> patch to backport the fix, it's more likely that somebody will do the
>> work to commit it as support for 2.7 has been extended until 2020.
>> Please note that I said "more likely", there's no guarantee given that
>> Python relies so much on volunteers.
>>
>
I got it. Thank you.



>
> The extended support is mostly focused on build (compiler) and security
> (internet) issues, to support software already written and *working* on 2.7.
>
> That said, if someone were to modify the patch to it could be imported to
> 2.7 (at least changing file names) or make changes to the relevant files by
> hand; run the tests, with whatever changes are needed so that they do run;
> and change the code as needed so all tests pass; sign the contributor
> agreement; and post a properly formatted test to the tracker and indicate a
> readiness to respond to comments; then it might get some attention.
>
> --
> Terry Jan Reedy
>

I'm sorry if I bothered you. I just want to know whether the existing
bugfix will be backported or not.
I should be more careful to post even a small question.

--
regards,
makoto kuwata

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web