Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #94757 > unrolled thread

Re: Gmail eats Python

Started byCameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
First post2015-07-30 10:43 +1000
Last post2015-07-30 10:43 +1000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Gmail eats Python Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2015-07-30 10:43 +1000

#94757 — Re: Gmail eats Python

FromCameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
Date2015-07-30 10:43 +1000
SubjectRe: Gmail eats Python
Message-ID<mailman.1083.1438217036.3674.python-list@python.org>
On 29Jul2015 10:51, random832@fastmail.us <random832@fastmail.us> wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 26, 2015, at 07:48, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> At first, there was only the machine language. Assembly languages
>> introduced "mnemonics" for the weaklings who couldn't remember the
>> opcodes by heart.
>
>To be fair, x86 is also a particularly terrible example of a machine
>language, from the perspective of someone imagining being expected to
>memorize it. Compare it with PDP-11, which had eight registers and eight
>addressing modes and a whole lot less to memorize (since each of these
>appears in every instruction as a single octal digit).

16 registers - you forget the alternate register set.

Since the UNIX V7 kernel code never made use of them we used to use them as a 
crude messaging system from user space, as what you put there sayed there, 
globally accessible by other users.

Cheers,
Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>

TeX: When you pronounce it correctly to your computer, the terminal may
     become slightly moist.     - D. E. Knuth.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web