Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #94757
| Date | 2015-07-30 10:43 +1000 |
|---|---|
| From | Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> |
| Subject | Re: Gmail eats Python |
| References | <1438181473.3233902.336329649.4B869E37@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1083.1438217036.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 29Jul2015 10:51, random832@fastmail.us <random832@fastmail.us> wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 26, 2015, at 07:48, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> At first, there was only the machine language. Assembly languages
>> introduced "mnemonics" for the weaklings who couldn't remember the
>> opcodes by heart.
>
>To be fair, x86 is also a particularly terrible example of a machine
>language, from the perspective of someone imagining being expected to
>memorize it. Compare it with PDP-11, which had eight registers and eight
>addressing modes and a whole lot less to memorize (since each of these
>appears in every instruction as a single octal digit).
16 registers - you forget the alternate register set.
Since the UNIX V7 kernel code never made use of them we used to use them as a
crude messaging system from user space, as what you put there sayed there,
globally accessible by other users.
Cheers,
Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
TeX: When you pronounce it correctly to your computer, the terminal may
become slightly moist. - D. E. Knuth.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Gmail eats Python Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2015-07-30 10:43 +1000
csiph-web