Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #197328

Re: Python recompile

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c, comp.lang.c++, comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Python recompile
Date Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:12:38 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 64
Message-ID <vq6cln$1pn29$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <vq1qas$j22$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vq1uvb$qbuq$1@dont-email.me> <vq22nc$rvb8$1@dont-email.me> <vq24kd$rg6i$1@dont-email.me> <vq3oag$18iv6$1@dont-email.me> <vq4hf2$1brf7$1@dont-email.me> <vq4l3d$1ck9e$1@dont-email.me> <vq4obb$1dbo2$1@dont-email.me> <vq4sm8$1ck9d$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Injection-Date Tue, 04 Mar 2025 09:12:41 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info dont-email.me; posting-host="b536dc0ad3c0f38a4267cb79f0739ef9"; logging-data="1891401"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/0hRJ3fAInRp+Zjoard8tZlbydMaOHWS8="
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Cancel-Lock sha1:ermCvCcIYAd8+AX0JKy0SBkRIvs=
In-Reply-To <vq4sm8$1ck9d$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language en-GB
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.c:390735 comp.lang.c++:121859 comp.lang.python:197328

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On 03/03/2025 19:33, geodandw wrote:
> On 3/3/25 12:19, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> On 03/03/2025 16:24, geodandw wrote:
>>> On 3/3/25 10:22, James Kuyper wrote:

>>>>   That sounds like a C issue to me.
>>>>
>>>> If it were a C problem, then the C source code that produced the 
>>>> problem
>>>> should have been shown. It's hard to debug code that you can't see.
>>> Why is this group so intolerant?
>>
>> Why are you so intolerant of other people's wish to keep this group 
>> topical?
>>
> 
> A. Because the problem is apparently using the right options on the 
> compiler, which seems like a C question to me.

I don't know what your experience with C is - if you have posted 
anything in c.l.c. that indicates that, it must have been too long ago 
for me to remember.  But a number of people with decades long experience 
of not only working with C, but helping people in c.l.c. with their C 
problems, have made it clear that this is /not/ a C question.  They also 
did their best to help the OP - giving what help they could despite this 
being the wrong place and the question being off-topic, and they did 
their best to redirect the OP to places where he might get more useful help.

> B.Because some people in this group are arrogant. rude, and 
> insulting..If the shoe fits, wear it.

Originally, people /politely/ pointed out that the post was off-topic, 
and the OP was unlikely to get good help here.  Indeed, I don't think 
anyone has been other than polite to the OP.

But there have been two people in this thread who have perhaps been 
rude, arrogant and insulting - insisting that /they/ know better than 
the regulars about what is topical and not topical for the group.  Those 
posters have not in any way been helpful, and are just a waste of 
bandwidth for everyone else.

I don't know what you think you are trying to achieve here.  Do you 
think that your complaints will somehow magically make the OP's problem 
about the C programming language, rather than the build process for a 
particular and specific complex piece of software?  Do you think that by 
posting repeatedly, someone here will suddenly realise they know 
something that could help the OP?  Do you think you will change the 
group topicality?

All you have achieved is annoying some people, and ensuring that the 
thread can't develop topically.

If you want to understand what is topical or not for this group, 
consider if a question could conceivably by used as an example or an 
exercise in a published book about learning or using the C programming 
language.  Then it is probably on-topic.  If you'd only find it in a 
book called "C programming for Windows", or "Systems programming in 
Unix", or "C development with gcc", then it is likely to be too 
specific.  The OP's question is far too niche for any kind of book at 
all - he needs to look at build instructions for Python to understand 
what is going on.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Python recompile doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-03-02 14:35 +0000
  Re: Python recompile Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-03-02 15:54 +0000
    Re: Python recompile Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-03-02 16:58 +0000
      Re: Python recompile Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-03-02 17:08 +0000
        Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-03 08:14 +0000
      Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-02 12:30 -0500
        Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-02 18:35 +0000
        Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-03 08:13 +0000
          Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-03 08:31 +0000
            Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-03 10:44 +0000
              Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-03 12:20 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-03 15:03 +0000
              Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-03 12:47 +0000
          Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-03 10:22 -0500
            Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-03 16:19 +0000
            Re: Python recompile geodandw <geodandw@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 11:24 -0500
              Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-03 16:26 +0000
              Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-03 11:39 -0500
                Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-03 16:56 +0000
                Re: Python recompile David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-03 18:22 +0100
                Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-04 08:31 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-04 17:28 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-03 17:25 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-04 08:32 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-04 08:56 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-04 09:23 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-04 09:57 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-04 10:03 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-04 10:25 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-04 11:19 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-04 17:42 +0000
                Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-04 18:16 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-05 09:10 +0000
                Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-06 19:21 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-07 09:53 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-07 21:26 +0000
                Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-07 21:33 +0000
                Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-10 14:39 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-06 03:16 +0000
                Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-04 19:12 -0500
                Re: Python recompile gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2025-03-03 23:42 +0000
                Re: Python recompile geodandw <geodandw@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 13:29 -0500
                Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-03 16:52 -0500
              Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-03 17:19 +0000
                Re: Python recompile geodandw <geodandw@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 13:33 -0500
                Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-03 19:15 +0000
                Re: Python recompile geodandw <geodandw@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 18:51 -0500
                Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-04 00:49 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-04 02:29 +0000
                Re: Python recompile David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-04 09:12 +0100
                Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-04 11:33 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Muffley@DinkyHQ.org - 2025-03-04 12:00 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-04 15:31 +0200
              Re: Python recompile David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-03 18:28 +0100
                Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-04 08:33 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-04 18:06 +0000
              Re: Python recompile Stuart Redmann <DerTopper@web.de> - 2025-03-06 07:35 +0100
                Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-06 07:32 +0000
                Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-06 08:39 +0000
                Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-06 12:40 -0800
                Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-07 13:17 -0500
          Re: Python recompile doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-03-03 16:12 +0000
    Re: Python recompile Left Right <olegsivokon@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 23:26 +0100
  Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-02 17:54 +0000
    Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-02 19:15 +0000
    Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-02 13:38 -0500
      Re: Python recompile doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-03-03 00:42 +0000
        Re: Python recompile doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-03-03 00:46 +0000
        Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-02 22:24 -0500
      Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-03 17:20 +0000
        Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-03 17:28 +0000
        Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-03 12:57 -0500
        Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-03 18:02 +0000
        Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-03 19:37 +0000
  Re: Python recompile (Posting On Python-List Prohibited) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-04 05:46 +0000

csiph-web