Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #12735
| From | tinnews@isbd.co.uk |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Functions vs OOP |
| Date | 2011-09-04 09:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tiobj8-sng.ln1@chris.zbmc.eu> (permalink) |
| References | <j3tjov$c30$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.743.1315075846.27778.python-list@python.org> |
Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 10:15 AM, William Gill <noreply@domain.invalid> wrote: > > During some recent research, and re-familiarization with Python, I came > > across documentation that suggests that programming using functions, and > > programming using objects were somehow opposing techniques. > > > > It seems to me that they are complimentary. It makes sense to create > > objects and have some functions that take those objects as arguments. Are > > they suggesting that any function that takes an object as an argument should > > always be a method of that object? Conversely I can see creating functions > > that take raw input (e.g. strings) and return it in a format compatible with > > an object's constructor, rather than have objects accept any conceivable > > format for its constructor. > > > > Am I missing something, or am I taking things too literally? > > I think you may be confusing "functional programming" and "programming > using functions". These are not the same thing. > > Functional programming is about using functions in the *mathematical* > sense. A mathematical function maps one value (or tuple of values) to > another value. The mapped value never varies; if it did, it would be > a different function. So functional programming eschews the use of > functions where the results depend on any internal or external state > beyond the values of the passed-in arguments, such as the variable > state of the object the method is being called on. > I think there may be another issue here. If someone says "functional programming" to me then I would generally assume that they *do* mean "programming using functions". While your distinction of the two may be strictly correct I don't think it's the generally accepted meaning. -- Chris Green
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Functions vs OOP William Gill <noreply@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-03 12:15 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-09-04 02:25 +1000
Re: Functions vs OOP Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-09-03 15:15 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <noreply@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-03 17:34 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-09-04 07:39 +1000
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <nospam@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-03 17:58 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-09-03 21:51 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <noreply@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-03 22:18 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <nospam@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-05 14:58 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-09-03 17:29 +0100
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <noreply@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-03 17:09 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-09-03 12:50 -0600
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <noreply@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-03 17:13 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP tinnews@isbd.co.uk - 2011-09-04 09:13 +0100
Re: Functions vs OOP Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-09-04 21:18 +1000
Re: Functions vs OOP Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-09-04 14:32 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <nospam@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-04 15:43 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-09-05 09:41 +1000
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <nospam@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-04 20:46 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-09-05 10:59 +1000
Re: Functions vs OOP rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-09-04 06:13 -0700
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <noreply@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-05 13:45 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2011-09-05 21:04 +0200
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <nospam@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-05 20:30 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-09-05 18:55 -0400
csiph-web