Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #12730
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Functions vs OOP |
| Date | 2011-09-03 21:51 -0400 |
| References | <j3tjov$c30$1@dont-email.me> <4e625508$0$29973$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.746.1315077390.27778.python-list@python.org> <j3u6es$e6i$1@dont-email.me> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.752.1315101158.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 9/3/2011 5:34 PM, William Gill wrote: > On 9/3/2011 3:15 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: >>> William Gill wrote: >>> >>>> During some recent research, and re-familiarization with Python, I came >>>> across documentation >> >> Ours, or someone else's? > > Python. > >> >> Since in Python, everything is an object, that would mean that every >> function has to be a method, which would mean creating classes just to >> have a class to attach functions to. How awful. > > Exactly why I asked, but I realize the the mistake was mine. I think > they were talking about "functional programming" not "using functions in > an OO program." It is possible that our doc was less than crystal clear. We are constantly improving it where we can see fixable faults. If you run across whatever it was and it still seems a bit muddy, post something again. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Functions vs OOP William Gill <noreply@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-03 12:15 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-09-04 02:25 +1000
Re: Functions vs OOP Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-09-03 15:15 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <noreply@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-03 17:34 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-09-04 07:39 +1000
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <nospam@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-03 17:58 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-09-03 21:51 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <noreply@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-03 22:18 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <nospam@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-05 14:58 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-09-03 17:29 +0100
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <noreply@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-03 17:09 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-09-03 12:50 -0600
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <noreply@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-03 17:13 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP tinnews@isbd.co.uk - 2011-09-04 09:13 +0100
Re: Functions vs OOP Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-09-04 21:18 +1000
Re: Functions vs OOP Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-09-04 14:32 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <nospam@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-04 15:43 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-09-05 09:41 +1000
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <nospam@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-04 20:46 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-09-05 10:59 +1000
Re: Functions vs OOP rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-09-04 06:13 -0700
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <noreply@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-05 13:45 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2011-09-05 21:04 +0200
Re: Functions vs OOP William Gill <nospam@domain.invalid> - 2011-09-05 20:30 -0400
Re: Functions vs OOP Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-09-05 18:55 -0400
csiph-web