Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #75859
| From | Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? |
| Date | 2014-08-07 21:10 -0400 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <roy-5A9393.21105207082014@news.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <c4gjqvF8cmiU1@mid.individual.net> <roy-B1A7CD.07544807082014@news.panix.com> <mailman.12725.1407413212.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-AF3AC4.08190707082014@news.panix.com> <mailman.12729.1407433146.18130.python-list@python.org> |
In article <mailman.12729.1407433146.18130.python-list@python.org>, Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> wrote: > On 2014-08-07 08:19, Roy Smith wrote: > > > My glob.iglob() uses os.listdir() behind the scenes (see glob1() > > > in glob.py) > > > > > > -tkc > > > > In which case, the documentation for iglob() is broken. It says: > > > > "Return an iterator which yields the same values as glob() without > > actually storing them all simultaneously." > > I'd tend to agree that iglob() is broken and should use the > proposed .scandir() instead for exactly those reasons. > Unfortunately, it seems that it might not get back-ported > until .scandir() hits. > > -tkc I opened a bug against the 2.7 docs: http://bugs.python.org/issue22167
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Virgil Stokes <vs@it.uu.se> - 2014-08-06 23:46 +0200
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-08-07 18:14 +1200
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2014-08-07 17:08 +1000
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-08-07 07:54 -0400
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-08-07 14:06 +0200
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-08-07 07:05 -0500
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-08-07 08:19 -0400
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-08-07 12:37 -0500
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-08-07 21:10 -0400
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2014-08-07 20:15 +0000
csiph-web