Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #75855
| Date | 2014-08-07 12:37 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> |
| Subject | Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? |
| References | <mailman.12711.1407363468.18130.python-list@python.org> <c4gjqvF8cmiU1@mid.individual.net> <roy-B1A7CD.07544807082014@news.panix.com> <mailman.12725.1407413212.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-AF3AC4.08190707082014@news.panix.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.12729.1407433146.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 2014-08-07 08:19, Roy Smith wrote: > > My glob.iglob() uses os.listdir() behind the scenes (see glob1() > > in glob.py) > > > > -tkc > > In which case, the documentation for iglob() is broken. It says: > > "Return an iterator which yields the same values as glob() without > actually storing them all simultaneously." I'd tend to agree that iglob() is broken and should use the proposed .scandir() instead for exactly those reasons. Unfortunately, it seems that it might not get back-ported until .scandir() hits. -tkc
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Virgil Stokes <vs@it.uu.se> - 2014-08-06 23:46 +0200
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-08-07 18:14 +1200
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2014-08-07 17:08 +1000
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-08-07 07:54 -0400
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-08-07 14:06 +0200
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-08-07 07:05 -0500
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-08-07 08:19 -0400
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-08-07 12:37 -0500
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-08-07 21:10 -0400
Re: Test for an empty directory that could be very large if it is not empty? John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2014-08-07 20:15 +0000
csiph-web