Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #44696
| From | Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Highest performance Python framework for API exposure? |
| Date | 2013-05-03 20:18 -0400 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <roy-4B8DD5.20184903052013@news.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <mailman.1269.1367590981.3114.python-list@python.org> |
In article <mailman.1269.1367590981.3114.python-list@python.org>, Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> wrote: > Which Python framework has benchmarked the highest? > > I am looking for a solution to initially run on Heroku or OpenShift; > but eventually run on a pure IaaS. > > Will expose the interfaces RESTfully as JSON, purposed to act as the > "glue" between the endpoints, databases (incl. caches) and queues. Based on my experience, it doesn't matter what framework you use. All that's going to matter is how fast you can pump data in and out of your database. The overhead added by the Python front-end probably won't be significant. Pick a framework that you find easy to use and don't sweat it. Invest your time worrying about your database. > An additional requirement is support for serving static, downloadable > content efficiently. You don't want to do that with Python. You want to do that with something that's optimized for serving static content (such as nginx).
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Highest performance Python framework for API exposure? Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2013-05-04 00:22 +1000 Re: Highest performance Python framework for API exposure? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-05-03 20:18 -0400
csiph-web