Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63749
| From | Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: parametized unittest |
| Date | 2014-01-11 23:34 -0500 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <roy-49C7C9.23343011012014@news.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <c11a3b62-2053-4b6f-afda-d2df305f58e5@googlegroups.com> <mailman.5355.1389500996.18130.python-list@python.org> |
In article <mailman.5355.1389500996.18130.python-list@python.org>, "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 08:00:05PM -0800, CraftyTech wrote: > > I'm finding it hard to use unittest in a for loop. Perhaps something like: > > > > for val in range(25): > > self.assertEqual(val,5,"not equal) > > > > The loop will break after the first failure. Anyone have a good > > approach for this? please advise. > > If Python 3.4 is an option, you can stick to the standard library and > use subtests [1]. Or, as yet another alternative, if you use nose, you can write test generators. https://nose.readthedocs.org/en/latest/writing_tests.html#test-generators
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
parametized unittest CraftyTech <hmmedina@gmail.com> - 2014-01-11 20:00 -0800
Re: parametized unittest Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-01-12 15:22 +1100
Re: parametized unittest "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> - 2014-01-11 20:28 -0800
Re: parametized unittest Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-01-11 23:34 -0500
Re: parametized unittest CraftyTech <hmmedina@gmail.com> - 2014-01-12 08:57 -0800
csiph-web