Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63748
| Date | 2014-01-11 20:28 -0800 |
|---|---|
| From | "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> |
| Subject | Re: parametized unittest |
| References | <c11a3b62-2053-4b6f-afda-d2df305f58e5@googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5355.1389500996.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 08:00:05PM -0800, CraftyTech wrote: > I'm finding it hard to use unittest in a for loop. Perhaps something like: > > for val in range(25): > self.assertEqual(val,5,"not equal) > > The loop will break after the first failure. Anyone have a good > approach for this? please advise. If Python 3.4 is an option, you can stick to the standard library and use subtests [1]. Cheers, Trevor [1]: http://docs.python.org/3.4/library/unittest.html#distinguishing-test-iterations-using-subtests -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
parametized unittest CraftyTech <hmmedina@gmail.com> - 2014-01-11 20:00 -0800
Re: parametized unittest Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-01-12 15:22 +1100
Re: parametized unittest "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> - 2014-01-11 20:28 -0800
Re: parametized unittest Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-01-11 23:34 -0500
Re: parametized unittest CraftyTech <hmmedina@gmail.com> - 2014-01-12 08:57 -0800
csiph-web