Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #106884
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Is threading better on Usenet or gmane? |
| Date | Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:55:46 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Lines | 29 |
| Message-ID | <negdti$mum$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <negc2n$lr0$1@reader1.panix.com> <1460385693.3220159.575241033.0E32F975@webmail.messagingengine.com> <mailman.31.1460385695.15650.python-list@python.org> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 67-130-15-94.dia.static.qwest.net |
| X-Trace | reader1.panix.com 1460386546 23510 67.130.15.94 (11 Apr 2016 14:55:46 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@panix.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:55:46 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | slrn/1.0.2 (Linux) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:106884 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2016-04-11, Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> wrote:
> I've already outlined under what circumstances threading is likely
> to be broken (before the recent changes):
>
>| For users reading by the mailing list, Usenet users' replies to
>| Mailing List users will be broken (but their replies to each other
>| will be fine). For users reading by Usenet, Mailing List users'
>| replies to each other will be broken (though all replies made via
>| Usenet or to Usenet users will be fine).
>
> gmane is essentially the same as reading it by email as far as this
> issue is concerned.
>
> What the new change (see Mark Sapiro's recent posts on this topic)
> should fix is the first half of that. It doesn't necessarily do anything
> about the second half:
OK. So recent fix should fix all gateway-related thread breakage for
mailing-list readers (which includes gmane). I had read most of the
thread on that change, but was still confused about exactly what was
getting fixed.
Thanks for clarifying it.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I'll eat ANYTHING
at that's BRIGHT BLUE!!
gmail.com
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is threading better on Usenet or gmane? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-11 14:24 +0000
Re: Is threading better on Usenet or gmane? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-04-11 10:41 -0400
Re: Is threading better on Usenet or gmane? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-11 14:55 +0000
Re: Is threading better on Usenet or gmane? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-11 15:58 +0000
Re: Is threading better on Usenet or gmane? Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 17:16 +0000
csiph-web