Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #89461
| From | Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Best GUI for Python |
| Date | 2015-04-27 16:54 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mhlihb$c9q$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <553cffc2$0$12998$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <85d22qk54u.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <mailman.29.1430089600.3680.python-list@python.org> <mhkme8$4gd$1@dont-email.me> <553de205$0$11128$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> |
Am 27.04.15 um 09:15 schrieb Steven D'Aprano: > On Monday 27 April 2015 16:55, Christian Gollwitzer wrote: > >> YMMV. Is non-BMP needed for any living non-esoteric language? I agree >> that it is a big flaw, but still is useful for very many projects. > > Yes. > > The Unicode Supplementary Multilingual Planes (SMPs) are used for rare but > still current East Asian characters (which means that some of your Chinese > users may not be able to write their names without it), also some > mathematics symbols (okay, that's *slightly* esoteric), as well as emoji. OK current Chinese characters count in. Were these available in pre-unicode 16bit encodings? If not, how did they cope? Not rying to defend the BMP, but still wondering whether this is a new issue due to the switch from 16bit to unicode, or if people can finally use all characters thanks to unicode (software with full support). Emoji and rare math is somewhat more esoteric (given the limited codepoint space) > None of those uses are critical (unless you have a lot of Chinese users) but > supporting the SMPs should not be considered optional. I fully agree. Full unicode is one of the goals for Tcl9, but Tcl/Tk is missing manpower to actually implement that stuff (and people with skills in unicode platform APIs) Christian
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Best GUI for Python Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-26 15:02 +0200
Re: Best GUI for Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-27 01:09 +1000
Re: Best GUI for Python Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-26 18:32 +0200
Re: Best GUI for Python Gary Herron <gherron@digipen.edu> - 2015-04-26 10:12 -0700
Re: Best GUI for Python Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-26 20:07 +0200
Re: Best GUI for Python IronManMark20 <mr.smittye@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 12:04 -0700
Re: Best GUI for Python Gary Herron <gary.herron@islandtraining.com> - 2015-04-26 13:06 -0700
Re: Best GUI for Python Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-04-27 06:26 +1000
Re: Best GUI for Python Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-04-27 17:02 +0000
Re: Best GUI for Python Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-04-27 23:17 +0200
Re: Best GUI for Python Dave Farrance <DaveFarrance@OMiTTHiSyahooANDTHiS.co.uk> - 2015-04-28 08:05 +0100
Re: Best GUI for Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-27 09:06 +1000
Re: Best GUI for Python Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-04-27 08:55 +0200
Re: Best GUI for Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-27 17:15 +1000
Re: Best GUI for Python Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-04-27 16:54 +0200
Re: Best GUI for Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-28 02:31 +1000
Re: Best GUI for Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-27 17:22 +1000
Re: Best GUI for Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-28 15:10 +1000
Re: Best GUI for Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-28 15:32 +1000
Re: Best GUI for Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-28 16:43 +1000
Re: Best GUI for Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-28 16:59 +1000
Re: Best GUI for Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-28 17:54 +1000
Re: Best GUI for Python Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-04-28 10:00 +0200
Re: Best GUI for Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-28 18:07 +1000
Re: Best GUI for Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-04-28 21:05 -0700
Re: Best GUI for Python wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2015-04-29 00:00 -0700
Re: Best GUI for Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-04-29 10:03 +0100
Re: Best GUI for Python Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-26 18:16 +0200
Re: Best GUI for Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-04-26 18:08 +0100
Re: Best GUI for Python wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2015-04-27 02:02 -0700
Re: Best GUI for Python Dave Cook <davecook@nowhere.net> - 2015-04-28 17:22 +0000
csiph-web