Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #89532

Re: Best GUI for Python

Show all headers | View raw

On 29/04/2015 05:05, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Monday, April 27, 2015 at 12:52:48 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Christian Gollwitzer  wrote:
>>> Am 27.04.15 um 01:06 schrieb Chris Angelico:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Ben Finney
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't have to. By using the newer ‘tkinter.ttk’ library
>>>>> <URL:https://docs.python.org/3/library/tkinter.ttk.html>, the GUI will
>>>>> use native look-and-feel widgets.
>>>>>
>>>> Does the new library also deal with the ongoing issues with Unicode
>>>> support? AIUI there's some fundamental problem with Tkinter which
>>>> means that (possibly only on Windows?) non-BMP characters simply can't
>>>> be displayed.
>>>
>>>
>>> No. That is a fundamental limit in Tcl 8 (it uses UCS-2 to store strings),
>>> and will probably only addressed in Tcl 9. ttk addresses mostly the theming
>>> issue and is now "8 years new" (Tk 8.5a6) with a precursor (Tile) from ten
>>> years ago.
>>
>> Right, so this is an ongoing issue (at least for now).
>>
>>>> To me, that's a pretty bad flaw - we should be aiming
>>>> new projects at complete Unicode support, which means Python 3 and a
>>>> good GUI toolkit.
>>>
>>>
>>> YMMV. Is non-BMP needed for any living non-esoteric language? I agree that
>>> it is a big flaw, but still is useful for very many projects.
>>
>> Maybe not for the language itself, but then, you can transliterate
>> Chinese using nothing but Roman letters and Arabic numerals (all in
>> ASCII), so merely proving that you can represent text doesn't
>> necessarily mean everything. Mainly, SMP characters are used for
>> things like musical notes, mathematical symbols, emoticons, and so on.
>> (Also, I'm not sure of the current state of the art as regards Chinese
>> and Japanese characters.) If you support only the BMP, then you're far
>> better off than supporting only ASCII or only <some eight-bit code
>> page>, to be sure, but it's still cutting out some characters. For a
>> program that already exists, already works, and can't handle non-BMP
>> characters, it's a small issue, and not one that I'd be recommending a
>> complete GUI toolkit replacement for; but for a green-field project, I
>> would strongly recommend using Python 3 and some toolkit which
>> supports the full Unicode range.
>
> Everything else being equal this is likely fine advice.
> However everything is rarely equal; eg the one time I tried to use wxpython
> it segfaulted, probably the only time in 15 years of python-use that Ive
> got python to segfault.
>
>>
>> This is a problem that won't just "go away". As more SMP blocks get
>> assigned, more people will start using them, and get frustrated at
>> your program for not letting them. (And why should an end user need to
>> know the difference between 😃 and ⍥, that the second one works and
>> the first doesn't?) Unless you're willing to wait for a Python that
>> ships Tcl 9, Tkinter is a choice that restricts your end users.
>
> The issue is a bit subtle and nuanced
> Python is 2 (at least) things
> 1. A fine unicode supporting framework
> 2. A glue for putting together systems composed of various components
>
> Since some of those *other* components may break, it would be good for the
> 'glueness' of python to break more smoothly than it currently does.
>
> http://blog.languager.org/2015/03/whimsical-unicode.html#half-assed
> is a very non-exhaustive list – not just Tkinter – of
> - ostensibly unicode-supporting
> - actually SMP-borked
> software
>
> IOW it would be good if bugs (enhancements actually) like these be resolved:
>
> http://bugs.python.org/issue23672
> http://bugs.python.org/issue18814
> http://bugs.python.org/issue22264
>

Those who can do, those who can't teach :)

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Best GUI for Python Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-26 15:02 +0200
  Re: Best GUI for Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-27 01:09 +1000
    Re: Best GUI for Python Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-26 18:32 +0200
      Re: Best GUI for Python Gary Herron <gherron@digipen.edu> - 2015-04-26 10:12 -0700
        Re: Best GUI for Python Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-26 20:07 +0200
          Re: Best GUI for Python IronManMark20 <mr.smittye@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 12:04 -0700
          Re: Best GUI for Python Gary Herron <gary.herron@islandtraining.com> - 2015-04-26 13:06 -0700
    Re: Best GUI for Python Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-04-27 06:26 +1000
      Re: Best GUI for Python Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-04-27 17:02 +0000
        Re: Best GUI for Python Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-04-27 23:17 +0200
          Re: Best GUI for Python Dave Farrance <DaveFarrance@OMiTTHiSyahooANDTHiS.co.uk> - 2015-04-28 08:05 +0100
    Re: Best GUI for Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-27 09:06 +1000
      Re: Best GUI for Python Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-04-27 08:55 +0200
        Re: Best GUI for Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-27 17:15 +1000
          Re: Best GUI for Python Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-04-27 16:54 +0200
            Re: Best GUI for Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-28 02:31 +1000
        Re: Best GUI for Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-27 17:22 +1000
          Re: Best GUI for Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-28 15:10 +1000
            Re: Best GUI for Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-28 15:32 +1000
              Re: Best GUI for Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-28 16:43 +1000
                Re: Best GUI for Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-28 16:59 +1000
                Re: Best GUI for Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-28 17:54 +1000
                Re: Best GUI for Python Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-04-28 10:00 +0200
                Re: Best GUI for Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-28 18:07 +1000
          Re: Best GUI for Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-04-28 21:05 -0700
            Re: Best GUI for Python wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2015-04-29 00:00 -0700
            Re: Best GUI for Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-04-29 10:03 +0100
  Re: Best GUI for Python Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-26 18:16 +0200
    Re: Best GUI for Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-04-26 18:08 +0100
  Re: Best GUI for Python wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2015-04-27 02:02 -0700
  Re: Best GUI for Python Dave Cook <davecook@nowhere.net> - 2015-04-28 17:22 +0000

csiph-web