Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #44217

Re: Nested iteration?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.006
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; '*not*': 0.07; 'lines,': 0.07; '[1,': 0.09; 'iterate': 0.09; 'propagate': 0.09; 'raises': 0.09; 'valueerror:': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; '*other*': 0.16; '23,': 0.16; 'caveat': 0.16; 'happily': 0.16; 'ignoring': 0.16; 'loop.': 0.16; 'looping': 0.16; 'loops': 0.16; 'pairs': 0.16; 'pairs,': 0.16; 'starred': 0.16; 'unpack': 0.16; 'unpacking': 0.16; 'valueerror': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'stack': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'convenient': 0.24; 'instance,': 0.24; 'file.': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'first,': 0.26; 'this:': 0.26; 'values': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'reaches': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; '"",': 0.31; 'catching': 0.31; 'exceptions': 0.31; 'raised': 0.31; 'terminate': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'run': 0.32; '(i.e.': 0.33; '(most': 0.33; 'there,': 0.34; "i'd": 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; 'problem.': 0.35; 'definition': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'add': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'described': 0.36; 'returning': 0.36; 'method': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'being': 0.38; 'recent': 0.39; 'called': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'catch': 0.60; 'ian': 0.60; 'break': 0.61; 'mentioned': 0.61; 'numbers': 0.61; 'simply': 0.61; 'simple': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'more': 0.64; '(that': 0.65; 'occur': 0.65; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'unusual': 0.74; '"simply': 0.84; 'oscar': 0.84; 'numbers:': 0.91; '2013': 0.98
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=G0MAhx9Yn8WR3a6iKeilhh09gIB99HcyEY/2h361OrU=; b=ctVXOtn+XGp5FtEsM6X01O+NkSjvam9tAGWS2i0H/blXli+MohoKGx5m5E95QV+jSM x4wnxQSHpKxChMhM4taUCLb/4kPhxpBcq5ckILiZLpeCzzKowqkMw2VcJYHBlEd28Qkm wWrH/xFBBWD4yif1uvsa4y4/ZABErxwQ5C7Wy0LFb9RljgmmmY/fAvonVjQhHNn9RiAV FtNv/G3gndh63lYcEFeJWtb6tfqP48Sbo8EmlG/jv4s+pyTRWO9VGt+UFMYLesvzjikJ wMfx5aCViL+AMDGezSQbCd/wUeAREDPyDo2oP8cLqBmbMd/zmZRT1cd8SI/tPEiEmkbB owOg==
X-Received by 10.58.161.6 with SMTP id xo6mr23544603veb.50.1366752567590; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <CALwzidk6qz4qHOFWYqv_cDEtjbhvS_kjG0vXJZmeB0dJ07doTQ@mail.gmail.com>
References <kl6a1f$k2l$1@panix2.panix.com> <CAPTjJmpKR8z7Cub1WaurmsuugNgCvPYFdh9WYqJd_1OTfpLw6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzidk6qz4qHOFWYqv_cDEtjbhvS_kjG0vXJZmeB0dJ07doTQ@mail.gmail.com>
From Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com>
Date Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:29:07 +0100
Subject Re: Nested iteration?
To Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc Python <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.996.1366752575.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 53
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1366752575 news.xs4all.nl 2258 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:52104
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:44217

Show key headers only | View raw


On 23 April 2013 17:30, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The definition of the for loop is sufficiently simple that this is
>> safe, with the caveat already mentioned (that __iter__ is just
>> returning self). And calling next() inside the loop will simply
>> terminate the loop if there's nothing there, so I'd not have a problem
>> with code like that - for instance, if I wanted to iterate over pairs
>> of lines, I'd happily do this:
>>
>> for line1 in f:
>>   line2=next(f)
>>   print(line2)
>>   print(line1)
>>
>> That'll happily swap pairs, ignoring any stray line at the end of the
>> file. Why bother catching StopIteration just to break?
>
> The next() there will *not* "simply terminate the loop" if it raises a
> StopIteration; for loops do not catch StopIteration exceptions that
> are raised from the body of the loop.  The StopIteration will continue
> to propagate until it is caught or it reaches the sys.excepthook.  In
> unusual circumstances, it is even possible that it could cause some
> *other* loop higher in the stack to break (i.e. if the current code is
> being run as a result of the next() method being called by the looping
> construct).

I don't find that the circumstances are unusual. Pretty much any time
one of the functions in the call stack is a generator this problem
will occur if StopIteration propagates.

I just thought I'd add that Python 3 has a convenient way to avoid
this problem with next() which is to use the starred unpacking syntax:

>>> numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4]
>>> first, *numbers = numbers
>>> first
1
>>> for x in numbers:
...     print(x)
...
2
3
4
>>> first, *numbers = []
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ValueError: need more than 0 values to unpack

Since we get a ValueError instead of a StopIteration we don't have the
described problem.


Oscar

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Nested iteration? roy@panix.com (Roy Smith) - 2013-04-23 11:40 -0400
  Re: Nested iteration? Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 17:05 +0100
  Re: Nested iteration? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 10:05 -0600
  Re: Nested iteration? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-04-23 18:15 +0200
  Re: Nested iteration? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-24 02:21 +1000
  Re: Nested iteration? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-23 16:35 +0000
  Re: Nested iteration? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 10:30 -0600
  Re: Nested iteration? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 10:39 -0600
  Re: Nested iteration? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-24 02:42 +1000
    Re: Nested iteration? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-23 16:53 +0000
  Re: Nested iteration? Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-04-23 16:49 -0400
  Re: Nested iteration? Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 22:14 +0100
  Re: Nested iteration? Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 22:29 +0100
  Re: Nested iteration? Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 22:41 +0100
  Re: Nested iteration? Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 23:42 +0100

csiph-web