Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #44181

Re: There must be a better way

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python.list@tim.thechases.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; '(python': 0.07; 'explicit': 0.07; 'indexing': 0.07; 'variables': 0.07; 'cleanup': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; '-tkc': 0.16; 'bound.': 0.16; 'csv': 0.16; 'dict(': 0.16; 'enough.': 0.16; 'from:addr:python.list': 0.16; 'from:addr:tim.thechases.com': 0.16; 'from:name:tim chase': 0.16; 'lambda': 0.16; 'notably': 0.16; 'robust.': 0.16; 'situation.': 0.16; 'subject:There': 0.16; 'index': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; 'module': 0.19; '(in': 0.22; 'handles': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'headers': 0.24; 'simpler': 0.24; 'williams': 0.24; 'header': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'usually': 0.31; 'division': 0.31; 'overhead': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'reader': 0.33; 'skip:d 20': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; "can't": 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'add': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'doing': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'needed': 0.38; 'files': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'major': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'times': 0.62; 'such': 0.63; 'skip:n 10': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'believe': 0.68; 'skip:r 30': 0.69; 'hand': 0.80; 'faster.': 0.84; 'indirect': 0.84; 'received:50.22': 0.84; 'notorious': 0.91; 'you).': 0.95
Date Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:30:05 -0500
From Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com>
To Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu>
Subject Re: There must be a better way
In-Reply-To <atnh2jFgv8iU1@mid.individual.net>
References <kkv9bt$9bm$1@theodyn.ncf.ca> <51732d81$0$29977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <20130420193422.25255e98@bigbox.christie.dr> <mailman.869.1366506610.3114.python-list@python.org> <kl0opb$pcr$1@theodyn.ncf.ca> <atl0i2Fto6uU2@mid.individual.net> <kl3stb$5ck$1@theodyn.ncf.ca> <atnh2jFgv8iU1@mid.individual.net>
X-Mailer Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-AntiAbuse This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse Primary Hostname - boston.accountservergroup.com
X-AntiAbuse Original Domain - python.org
X-AntiAbuse Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse Sender Address Domain - tim.thechases.com
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.973.1366727321.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 58
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1366727321 news.xs4all.nl 2169 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36443
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:44181

Show key headers only | View raw


On 2013-04-23 13:36, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> On 2013-04-22, Colin J. Williams <cjw@ncf.ca> wrote:
> > Since I'm only interested in one or two columns, the simpler
> > approach is probably better.
> 
> Here's a sketch of how one of my projects handles that situation.
> I think the index variables are invaluable documentation, and
> make it a bit more robust. (Python 3, so not every bit is
> relevant to you).
> 
> with open("today.csv", encoding='UTF-8', newline='') as today_file:
>     reader = csv.reader(today_file)
>     header = next(reader)
>     majr_index = header.index('MAJR')
>     div_index = header.index('DIV')
>     for rec in reader:
>         major = rec[majr_index]
>         rec[div_index] = DIVISION_TABLE[major]
> 
> But a csv.DictReader might still be more efficient. I never
> tested. This is the only place I've used this "optimization".
> It's fast enough. ;)

I believe the csv module does all the work at c-level, rather than
as  pure Python, so it should be notably faster.  The only times I've
had to do things by hand like that are when there are header
peculiarities that I can't control, such as mismatched case or
added/remove punctuation (client files are notorious for this).  So I
often end up doing something like

  def normalize(header):
    return header.strip().upper() # other cleanup as needed

  reader = csv.reader(f)
  headers = next(reader)
  header_map = dict(
    (normalize(header), i)
    for i, header
    in enumerate(headers)
    )
  item = lambda col: row[header_map[col]].strip()
  for row in reader:
    major = item("MAJR").upper()
    division = item("DIV")
    # ...

The function calling might add overhead (in which case one could
just use explicit indirect indexing for each value assignment:

  major = row[header_map["MAJR"]].strip().upper()

but I usually find that processing CSV files leaves me I/O bound
rather than CPU bound.

-tkc


Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-20 19:46 -0400
  Re: There must be a better way Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2013-04-20 16:57 -0700
  Re: There must be a better way Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-21 00:06 +0000
    Re: There must be a better way Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-04-20 19:34 -0500
    Re: There must be a better way Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-04-20 21:07 -0400
      Re: There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-21 09:15 -0400
        Re: There must be a better way Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-04-21 16:39 +0300
          Re: There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-21 11:17 -0400
        Re: There must be a better way Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-04-21 15:43 +0200
          Re: There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-21 11:30 -0400
          Re: There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-21 11:30 -0400
        Re: There must be a better way Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-22 15:32 +0100
        Re: There must be a better way Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-04-22 14:42 +0000
          Re: There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-22 13:44 -0400
            Re: There must be a better way Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-04-23 13:36 +0000
              Re: There must be a better way Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 15:15 +0100
              Re: There must be a better way Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-04-23 09:30 -0500
              Re: There must be a better way Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2013-04-23 09:36 -0500
              Re: There must be a better way (correction) Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-04-23 10:02 -0500

csiph-web