Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #44011
| Date | 2013-04-21 11:30 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: There must be a better way |
| References | (1 earlier) <51732d81$0$29977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <20130420193422.25255e98@bigbox.christie.dr> <mailman.869.1366506610.3114.python-list@python.org> <kl0opb$pcr$1@theodyn.ncf.ca> <mailman.878.1366551835.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| Message-ID | <mailman.883.1366558805.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 21/04/2013 9:43 AM, Peter Otten wrote:
> Colin J. Williams wrote:
>
>> I was seeking some code that would be acceptable to both Python 2.7 and
>> 3.3.
>>
>> In the end, I used:
>>
>> inData= csv.reader(inFile)
>>
>> def main():
>> if ver == '2':
>> headerLine= inData.next()
>> else:
>> headerLine= inData.__next__()
>> ...
>
> I think it was mentioned before, but to be explicit:
>
> def main():
> headerLine = next(inData)
> ...
>
> works in Python 2.6, 2.7, and 3.x.
>
Yes, the penny dropped eventually. I've used your statement
The Chris suggestion was slightly different:
Use the built-in next() function
(http://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html#next ) instead:
headerLine = next(iter(inData))
Colin W.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-20 19:46 -0400
Re: There must be a better way Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2013-04-20 16:57 -0700
Re: There must be a better way Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-21 00:06 +0000
Re: There must be a better way Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-04-20 19:34 -0500
Re: There must be a better way Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-04-20 21:07 -0400
Re: There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-21 09:15 -0400
Re: There must be a better way Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-04-21 16:39 +0300
Re: There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-21 11:17 -0400
Re: There must be a better way Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-04-21 15:43 +0200
Re: There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-21 11:30 -0400
Re: There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-21 11:30 -0400
Re: There must be a better way Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-22 15:32 +0100
Re: There must be a better way Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-04-22 14:42 +0000
Re: There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-22 13:44 -0400
Re: There must be a better way Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-04-23 13:36 +0000
Re: There must be a better way Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 15:15 +0100
Re: There must be a better way Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-04-23 09:30 -0500
Re: There must be a better way Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2013-04-23 09:36 -0500
Re: There must be a better way (correction) Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-04-23 10:02 -0500
csiph-web