Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #44011

Re: There must be a better way

Date 2013-04-21 11:30 -0400
From "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: There must be a better way
References (1 earlier) <51732d81$0$29977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <20130420193422.25255e98@bigbox.christie.dr> <mailman.869.1366506610.3114.python-list@python.org> <kl0opb$pcr$1@theodyn.ncf.ca> <mailman.878.1366551835.3114.python-list@python.org>
Message-ID <mailman.883.1366558805.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 21/04/2013 9:43 AM, Peter Otten wrote:
> Colin J. Williams wrote:
>
>> I was seeking some code that would be acceptable to both Python 2.7 and
>> 3.3.
>>
>> In the end, I used:
>>
>> inData= csv.reader(inFile)
>>
>> def main():
>>       if ver == '2':
>>           headerLine= inData.next()
>>       else:
>>           headerLine= inData.__next__()
>>       ...
>
> I think it was mentioned before, but to be explicit:
>
> def main():
>      headerLine = next(inData)
>      ...
>
> works in Python 2.6, 2.7, and 3.x.
>

Yes, the penny dropped eventually.  I've used your statement

The Chris suggestion was slightly different:

Use the built-in next() function
(http://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html#next ) instead:
     headerLine = next(iter(inData))

Colin W.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-20 19:46 -0400
  Re: There must be a better way Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2013-04-20 16:57 -0700
  Re: There must be a better way Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-21 00:06 +0000
    Re: There must be a better way Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-04-20 19:34 -0500
    Re: There must be a better way Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-04-20 21:07 -0400
      Re: There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-21 09:15 -0400
        Re: There must be a better way Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-04-21 16:39 +0300
          Re: There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-21 11:17 -0400
        Re: There must be a better way Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-04-21 15:43 +0200
          Re: There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-21 11:30 -0400
          Re: There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-21 11:30 -0400
        Re: There must be a better way Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-22 15:32 +0100
        Re: There must be a better way Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-04-22 14:42 +0000
          Re: There must be a better way "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2013-04-22 13:44 -0400
            Re: There must be a better way Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-04-23 13:36 +0000
              Re: There must be a better way Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 15:15 +0100
              Re: There must be a better way Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-04-23 09:30 -0500
              Re: There must be a better way Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2013-04-23 09:36 -0500
              Re: There must be a better way (correction) Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-04-23 10:02 -0500

csiph-web