Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again)

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.029
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.96; 'S': 0.01; 'root': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'earliest': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'terms,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'numbers;': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'please?': 0.24; 'cc:20': 0.24; 'cc:no real name:20': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'this.': 0.32; 'fri,': 0.33; 'maybe': 0.34; 'subject: (': 0.35; 'agree': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'skip:- 10': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'called': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'numbers': 0.61; 'smith': 0.68; 'received:109': 0.72; 'electrical': 0.74; 'square': 0.74; 'discovered': 0.83; '(probably': 0.84; 'conflicts': 0.84; 'sfxlen:4': 0.84; 'pfxlen:big': 0.91; 'from.': 0.93; 'taught': 0.96; '2013': 0.98
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
To	python-list@python.org
From	Robin Becker <robin@reportlab.com>
Subject	Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again)
Date	Thu, 10 Oct 2013 14:29:37 +0100
References	<CAPTjJmrGrS6A50nV98vttQ2hv6avWewao3FQX81sej7S-Ottfw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Cc	python-list@python.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	109.174.168.73
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
In-Reply-To	<CAPTjJmrGrS6A50nV98vttQ2hv6avWewao3FQX81sej7S-Ottfw@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.938.1381411785.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	18
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1381411785 news.xs4all.nl 15959 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:52981
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:56567

Show key headers only | View raw

On 10/10/2013 14:25, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote:
>> BTW, one of the earliest things that turned me on to Python was when I
>> discovered that it uses j as the imaginary unit, not i.  All
>> right-thinking people will agree with me on this.
>
> I've never been well-up on complex numbers; can you elaborate on this,
> please? All I know is that I was taught that the square root of -1 is
> called i, and that hypercomplex numbers include i, j, k, and maybe
> even other terms, and I never understood where j comes from. Why is
> Python better for using j?
>
> ChrisA
>
Electrical Engineers  use j (probably to avoid conflicts with i (current).
--electrically yrs--
Robin Becker

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Robin Becker <robin@reportlab.com> - 2013-10-10 14:29 +0100

csiph-web