Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #56567 > unrolled thread

Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again)

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Robin Becker <robin@reportlab.com> - 2013-10-10 14:29 +0100

#56567 — Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again)

On 10/10/2013 14:25, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote:
>> BTW, one of the earliest things that turned me on to Python was when I
>> discovered that it uses j as the imaginary unit, not i.  All
>> right-thinking people will agree with me on this.
>
> I've never been well-up on complex numbers; can you elaborate on this,
> please? All I know is that I was taught that the square root of -1 is
> called i, and that hypercomplex numbers include i, j, k, and maybe
> even other terms, and I never understood where j comes from. Why is
> Python better for using j?
>
> ChrisA
>
Electrical Engineers  use j (probably to avoid conflicts with i (current).
--electrically yrs--
Robin Becker

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web