Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #56566

Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again)

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.071
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.91; '*S*': 0.05; 'root': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'earliest': 0.09; 'terms,': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'numbers;': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'please?': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'am,': 0.29; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'this.': 0.32; 'fri,': 0.33; 'maybe': 0.34; 'subject: (': 0.35; 'agree': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'called': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'numbers': 0.61; 'smith': 0.68; 'square': 0.74; 'discovered': 0.83; 'from.': 0.93; 'taught': 0.96; '2013': 0.98
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=geL6gx9zCLSiv7K9Jfj7EY/ywOJGoLSUGtdDOb86OUY=; b=sJcl1/NWnFaj9aWDZrflVLy7sGjCrvjmK4AZp9z1AXk7tsvvkRpgsPyfxnnDtpZnbY soHfoeAOFF2Hmr03/rxL1StexC4pjgrdeQzW8oMWmtfdPxk+8KVwe/1tLxvVFyEDpg3L gdCxQD006B0AJfeTyGzUj2w+MllRTUtSo7DhMMFslIzq2OyxN7MnZFEZ6QGm04FT9BVt YzhDN5CSxCKfRZN2hNth9Qp9selR4zf4zagdwoxkAvTYy+Sx4opTz3ivw7T4Of4o0I/l vFIZh/iBHfubbGU3N/mwk7WPO6srB+OVWolCYT3zcpHBXs+r9f2wkZlhcBuiM1VZ+u5j BBOg==
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.66.157.165 with SMTP id wn5mr9322584pab.169.1381411527608; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 06:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:25:27 +1100
Subject Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again)
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
To python-list@python.org
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.937.1381411535.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 12
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1381411535 news.xs4all.nl 15934 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50059
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:56566

Show key headers only | View raw

On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote:
> BTW, one of the earliest things that turned me on to Python was when I
> discovered that it uses j as the imaginary unit, not i.  All
> right-thinking people will agree with me on this.

I've never been well-up on complex numbers; can you elaborate on this,
please? All I know is that I was taught that the square root of -1 is
called i, and that hypercomplex numbers include i, j, k, and maybe
even other terms, and I never understood where j comes from. Why is
Python better for using j?

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-11 00:25 +1100
  Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-10 14:12 +0000
    Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-11 01:20 +1100
      Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-10 16:54 +0000
        Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2013-10-10 21:08 +0200
    Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> - 2013-10-10 11:36 -0400
    Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-10-10 10:39 -0700
    Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-10-10 20:13 -0400
    Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-11 17:01 +1100
    Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2013-10-11 12:21 +0100
  Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-11 01:27 +0000
    Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2013-10-11 20:35 +1100
    Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-10-11 12:30 +0100
      Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-10-11 15:11 +0300
      Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-10-11 10:05 -0400
        Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-11 17:03 +0000
        Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2013-10-11 13:00 -0400
    Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2013-10-15 22:27 -0700
      Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-10-16 08:21 -0400
      Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-10-16 13:22 -0400

csiph-web