Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #56671
| References | <mailman.937.1381411535.18130.python-list@python.org> <525753ee$0$29984$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-10-11 20:35 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) |
| From | David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.999.1381484151.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 11 October 2013 12:27, Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote: > On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:25:27 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote: >>> BTW, one of the earliest things that turned me on to Python was when I >>> discovered that it uses j as the imaginary unit, not i. All >>> right-thinking people will agree with me on this. >> >> I've never been well-up on complex numbers; can you elaborate on this, >> please? All I know is that I was taught that the square root of -1 is >> called i, and that hypercomplex numbers include i, j, k, and maybe even >> other terms, and I never understood where j comes from. Why is Python >> better for using j? > > Being simple souls and not Real Mathematicians, electrical engineers get > confused by the similarity between I (current) and i (square root of -1), > so they used j instead. [...] > <wink> No, electrical engineers need many symbols for current for the same reason that eskimos need many words for snow :) [*] [*] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eskimo_words_for_snow
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-11 00:25 +1100
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-10 14:12 +0000
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-11 01:20 +1100
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-10 16:54 +0000
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2013-10-10 21:08 +0200
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> - 2013-10-10 11:36 -0400
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-10-10 10:39 -0700
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-10-10 20:13 -0400
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-10-11 17:01 +1100
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2013-10-11 12:21 +0100
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-11 01:27 +0000
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2013-10-11 20:35 +1100
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-10-11 12:30 +0100
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-10-11 15:11 +0300
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-10-11 10:05 -0400
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-11 17:03 +0000
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2013-10-11 13:00 -0400
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2013-10-15 22:27 -0700
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-10-16 08:21 -0400
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-10-16 13:22 -0400
csiph-web