Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #69820

Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.048
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.91; '*S*': 0.00; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'chris,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'when,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'error': 0.23; 'paul': 0.24; 'regardless': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'least': 0.26; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'list:': 0.30; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'thanks': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'mailing': 0.39; 'guaranteed': 0.75; 'subject:good': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YDrXe7UHp/C9qHOu+mlEJaJ4ex5cmT8U3PCOlHM/P+8=; b=dt30LIroiSvIzTuLxVLrU2TVO9Bgd8jG7UiZrYBGuDyUdgcl20i6M+ejk9ksQJ5X9I jUUYDysX1gseu8KlV4IjCnLsf81geZ05fnfTIBzd1YZhZE8y9BT7lGpGz+7aQiH2aXjY XM4avSfQWt8hBUA4xAyac8Dg/0I+e1ohAXojLkCinjJgFym+oy1UNMfIZiUK2qUZG1R1 cRo4+rveychNsUNpeAbl75mqHoRtwIYhmW10dp2xT48eaNqoQRSb3gZqwmHTaDaclT9N hvtvpthCrPzetkZcGr2WWCMVyNiofJlqcEmUw2H/63DyL0+w9rYwENnGD8N/diJBH/mH dw7Q==
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.66.129.133 with SMTP id nw5mr201135pab.98.1396910822564; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 15:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <lhuvb1$shl$1@ger.gmane.org>
References <89df32f9-c8ae-4b7b-bfc4-01c574aabcae@googlegroups.com> <53410185.6050304@islandtraining.com> <5342C3AD.9080707@subsignal.org> <CAPTjJmoP_f3BEr3j+PD+KutAhiWPxPXrSUqPgmp7SDTJmJcA5Q@mail.gmail.com> <lhuvb1$shl$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date Tue, 8 Apr 2014 08:47:02 +1000
Subject Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad?
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Cc "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.8985.1396910826.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 8
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1396910826 news.xs4all.nl 2860 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59525
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:69820

Show key headers only | View raw

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Paul Kölle <paul@subsignal.org> wrote:
> Thanks Chris, stupid error indeed ;)

Error, at least :) This is why we have a mailing list: errors,
inaccuracies, and typos, regardless of who makes them or when, are
pretty much guaranteed to be caught.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-04-05 23:53 -0700
  Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Gary Herron <gary.herron@islandtraining.com> - 2014-04-06 00:25 -0700
  Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2014-04-06 00:55 -0700
    Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-04-06 08:07 -0700
  Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-06 18:25 +1000
  Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2014-04-06 04:01 -0700
  Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Paul Kölle <paul@subsignal.org> - 2014-04-07 17:26 +0200
  Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-08 01:44 +1000
  Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Paul Kölle <paul@subsignal.org> - 2014-04-07 21:46 +0200
  Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-08 08:47 +1000
  Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-04-07 20:16 -0400
    Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-08 02:53 +0000

csiph-web