Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #69749
| References | <89df32f9-c8ae-4b7b-bfc4-01c574aabcae@googlegroups.com> <53410185.6050304@islandtraining.com> |
|---|---|
| From | Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2014-04-06 00:55 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.8940.1396771007.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Gary Herron <gary.herron@islandtraining.com> wrote: > On 04/05/2014 11:53 PM, John Ladasky wrote: >> >> I find this programming pattern to be useful... but can it cause problems? > > No. > > What kind of problems are you considering? It won't break Python. It's > perfectly legal code. Agreed. Putting mutable objects inside tuples is common and totally OK. > The tuple c is still immutable, consisting of two specific objects, and (as > always) without regard to the specifics or contents of those two objects. You can choose to define mutability that way, but in many contexts you'll find that definition not very useful. c is such that you could have another variable d, where the following interpreter session fragment is easily possible: >>> c == d True >>> foo(c) >>> c == d False -- Devin >> Python 3.3.2+ (default, Feb 28 2014, 00:52:16) >> [GCC 4.8.1] on linux >> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>>>> >>>>> a = [1,2,3] >>>>> b = [4,5,6] >>>>> c = (a,b) >>>>> c >> >> ([1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]) >>>>> >>>>> c[0][0] = 0 >>>>> c >> >> ([0, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]) >> >> Comments appreciated. > > > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-04-05 23:53 -0700
Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Gary Herron <gary.herron@islandtraining.com> - 2014-04-06 00:25 -0700
Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2014-04-06 00:55 -0700
Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-04-06 08:07 -0700
Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-06 18:25 +1000
Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2014-04-06 04:01 -0700
Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Paul Kölle <paul@subsignal.org> - 2014-04-07 17:26 +0200
Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-08 01:44 +1000
Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Paul Kölle <paul@subsignal.org> - 2014-04-07 21:46 +0200
Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-08 08:47 +1000
Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-04-07 20:16 -0400
Re: Mutable objects inside tuples - good or bad? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-08 02:53 +0000
csiph-web