Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #9213
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <papillion@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.050 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.90; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.04; 'constructor': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'googling': 0.09; 'guys.': 0.09; 'seriously.': 0.09; 'subject:python': 0.12; 'gui': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.15; 'bill?': 0.16; 'paradigm': 0.16; 'linux': 0.18; 'to:2**1': 0.21; "doesn't": 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'received:209.85.220': 0.25; 'url:mailman': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'times.': 0.30; 'anthony': 0.30; 'url:listinfo': 0.32; 'does': 0.32; 'it.': 0.33; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.34; 'there': 0.34; 'reasons': 0.34; 'someone': 0.34; 'concepts': 0.34; 'quite': 0.34; 'phone:': 0.35; 'pretty': 0.35; "isn't": 0.35; 'probably': 0.35; 'stopped': 0.35; 'url:python': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'url:org': 0.38; 'user': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'think': 0.38; 'data': 0.39; 'happened': 0.39; 'help': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; "couldn't": 0.40; 'received:209': 0.40; 'help!': 0.40; 'week.': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'services': 0.61; 'phone': 0.63; 'cost': 0.65; 'discovered': 0.69; 'business': 0.70; 'anything.': 0.71; 'studio': 0.71; 'glades': 0.84; 'subject:tool': 0.84; 'subject:there': 0.91; 'subject:good': 0.93 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=8c+tSgu4UeJW/DYvQ3XueRu0wgtUg/th8FatY7aANeA=; b=Ys92XRLA5MPiOoGWHuMvKazqi8mVrD5u0PGUPPz9C/xny3eojnkCqSsJ4ut2pNF8gh clIKVxAlXtqKFfGdSeYJ1X8SAZFC89bIXThdK0LbXyjG/JmwsXDuiudcMNkQ3H2k5zj1 azpgsFVKfGcXR/kNlHHijhtu9vb7p8Y0C+69M= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <0439d15a-d6f3-435e-a4f9-416082596480@g9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> |
| References | <0439d15a-d6f3-435e-a4f9-416082596480@g9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> |
| Date | Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:51:57 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python |
| From | Anthony Papillion <papillion@gmail.com> |
| To | Ivan Kljaic <ikljaic@gmail.com>, python-list@python.org |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.874.1310345520.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 33 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1310345520 news.xs4all.nl 21814 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41958 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:9213 |
Show key headers only | View raw
As someone who was a Visual Studio user for many years, I felt much the same way you do when I made the jump to Python on Linux last year. But then I discovered Glade and am quite satisfied. Glades UI design paradigm is a little different than that of VS but it's not so hard that you couldn't learn it in a week. It's very usable, pretty easy to learn, and doesn't cost you a penny. If you've not already, I recommend you check out Glade. I think it's probably what you're looking for. Anthony On 7/10/11, Ivan Kljaic <ikljaic@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok Guys. I know that most of us have been expiriencing the need for a > nice Gui builder tool for RAD and most of us have been googling for it > a lot of times. But seriously. Why is the not even one single RAD tool > for Python. I mean what happened to boa constructor that it stopped > developing. I simply do not see any reasons why there isn't anything. > Please help me understand it. Any insights? > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > -- Anthony Papillion Advanced Data Concepts Get real about your software/web development and IT Services Phone: (918) 919-4624 Does your business need to reduce its phone bill? I can help! Email me and ask me how!
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Ivan Kljaic <ikljaic@gmail.com> - 2011-07-10 15:50 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Corey Richardson <kb1pkl@aim.com> - 2011-07-10 19:03 -0400
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python CM <cmpython@gmail.com> - 2011-07-10 16:49 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org> - 2011-07-10 20:42 -0400
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python "bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com" <bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 05:09 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-07-11 22:39 +1000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 06:44 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Thorsten Kampe <thorsten@thorstenkampe.de> - 2011-07-11 16:10 +0200
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 07:21 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Thorsten Kampe <thorsten@thorstenkampe.de> - 2011-07-11 16:38 +0200
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 00:39 +1000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 09:33 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 09:56 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 04:03 +1000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 11:52 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 05:27 +1000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-07-12 12:40 +1200
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Ivan Kljaic <ikljaic@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 11:28 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 05:16 +1000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 12:03 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 14:48 -0500
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 12:58 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 13:02 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 13:19 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 12:37 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Kevin Walzer <kw@codebykevin.com> - 2011-07-11 16:35 -0400
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 13:52 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python CM <cmpython@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 11:43 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 14:18 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python CM <cmpython@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 17:22 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-07-13 07:59 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-07-12 11:10 +1000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Speedbird <julio@techfuel.net> - 2011-07-11 09:38 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-07-12 20:24 +1000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 06:20 -0500
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 22:27 +1000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org> - 2011-07-10 20:43 -0400
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 03:47 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Anthony Papillion <papillion@gmail.com> - 2011-07-10 19:51 -0500
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 03:34 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Kevin Walzer <kw@codebykevin.com> - 2011-07-11 09:58 -0400
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2011-07-11 19:11 +0200
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python "Elias Fotinis" <efotinis@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-11 21:59 +0300
Re: Why isn't there a good RAD Gui tool for python Billy Mays <noway@nohow.com> - 2011-07-11 15:21 -0400
Re: Why isn't there a good RAD Gui tool for python Hansmeet Singh <hansmeetschool@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 20:05 -0800
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Dave Cook <davecook@nowhere.net> - 2011-07-11 23:33 +0000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 18:42 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 18:38 -0700
csiph-web