Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #9281

Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python

Date 2011-07-11 14:48 -0500
From Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python
References (7 earlier) <mailman.892.1310395160.1164.python-list@python.org> <d7bfdcef-f4a7-4f16-968c-6044a5d76907@j9g2000prj.googlegroups.com> <813f5c03-9916-4a18-bf09-6037db66f7a1@m22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <9455da26-74ba-4f2b-a9b0-f2f747432bdd@h4g2000vbw.googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmrMXLcqkG3kihrRW8e4ti53xfP6kAC5gnZtLTP4cxu4pg@mail.gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.922.1310413733.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

On 2011.07.11 02:16 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> You think Microsoft makes decisions and sticks with them? Look at 
> Office's last few versions. They can't decide on a file format, an 
> interface, a featureset... everything keeps changing.
Of course they do. They've decided to change things in each major
version to give people a reason to pay for the new version when there's
nothing wrong with the old one (at least nothing that's been fixed in
the new version :P ). Of course, MS is not the only software company
that employs such a strategy...

- -- 
CPython 3.2 | Windows NT 6.1.7601.17592 | Thunderbird 5.0
PGP/GPG Public Key ID: 0xF88E034060A78FCB
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAwAGBQJOG1ORAAoJEPiOA0Bgp4/LF7oH/Al6RTGIQ2hAKztEiob/oXnz
+eV8HZ0K+OBpd/FtRBkiMTJaQm5LU1jKPdwsf/RhF7UU69FfCQNfhzW5LsdMMQYE
+lh4YwbJ8cXVEkCgdkf2zh7BElJ9/95nYedd64Ev4sG+QECvLFYoeql5mjcO45S9
V+iElE9y4FsPr1E0tC2BhFPQuiRMRIIOjQQ7UKP28dnIOKf6u9QM4UdN4WYKOy+n
jgXRaFtstA3YtbzqmKfVoj9Go8SstF71XnGjSzAQeq4j96IfbvW/PTaPhkvyfB7y
tHG861oW19orvZ1ESJue/lvd/KQ7rRDRn7IjH+fKvKuYlgjM3+Q7hR7hcXi97Wg=
=a5A/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Ivan Kljaic <ikljaic@gmail.com> - 2011-07-10 15:50 -0700
  Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Corey Richardson <kb1pkl@aim.com> - 2011-07-10 19:03 -0400
  Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python CM <cmpython@gmail.com> - 2011-07-10 16:49 -0700
  Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org> - 2011-07-10 20:42 -0400
    Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python "bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com" <bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 05:09 -0700
      Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-07-11 22:39 +1000
        Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 06:44 -0700
          Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Thorsten Kampe <thorsten@thorstenkampe.de> - 2011-07-11 16:10 +0200
            Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 07:21 -0700
              Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Thorsten Kampe <thorsten@thorstenkampe.de> - 2011-07-11 16:38 +0200
              Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 00:39 +1000
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 09:33 -0700
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 09:56 -0700
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 04:03 +1000
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 11:52 -0700
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 05:27 +1000
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-07-12 12:40 +1200
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Ivan Kljaic <ikljaic@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 11:28 -0700
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 05:16 +1000
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 12:03 -0700
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 14:48 -0500
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 12:58 -0700
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 13:02 -0700
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 13:19 -0700
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 12:37 -0700
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Kevin Walzer <kw@codebykevin.com> - 2011-07-11 16:35 -0400
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 13:52 -0700
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python CM <cmpython@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 11:43 -0700
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 14:18 -0700
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python CM <cmpython@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 17:22 -0700
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-07-13 07:59 -0700
                Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-07-12 11:10 +1000
            Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Speedbird <julio@techfuel.net> - 2011-07-11 09:38 -0700
            Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-07-12 20:24 +1000
              Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 06:20 -0500
              Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 22:27 +1000
  Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org> - 2011-07-10 20:43 -0400
    Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 03:47 -0700
  Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Anthony Papillion <papillion@gmail.com> - 2011-07-10 19:51 -0500
  Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 03:34 -0700
  Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Kevin Walzer <kw@codebykevin.com> - 2011-07-11 09:58 -0400
  Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2011-07-11 19:11 +0200
  Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python "Elias Fotinis" <efotinis@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-11 21:59 +0300
    Re: Why isn't there a good RAD Gui tool for python Billy Mays <noway@nohow.com> - 2011-07-11 15:21 -0400
      Re: Why isn't there a good RAD Gui tool for python Hansmeet Singh <hansmeetschool@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 20:05 -0800
  Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Dave Cook <davecook@nowhere.net> - 2011-07-11 23:33 +0000
    Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 18:42 -0700
    Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 18:38 -0700

csiph-web