Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #9211
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!news.alt.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <awilliam@whitemice.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.007 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.04; 'constructor': 0.07; 'googling': 0.09; 'guys.': 0.09; 'myself,': 0.09; 'seriously.': 0.09; 'subject:python': 0.12; 'float': 0.13; 'gui': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.15; '[and': 0.16; 'bindings': 0.16; 'from:addr:awilliam': 0.16; 'from:addr:whitemice.org': 0.16; 'from:name:adam tauno williams': 0.16; 'message-id:@linux- yu4c.site': 0.16; 'on].': 0.16; 'orm': 0.16; 'received:72.14.190': 0.16; 'received:72.14.190.87': 0.16; 'received:mail.wmmi.net': 0.16; 'received:wmmi.net': 0.16; 'reply-to:addr:awilliam': 0.16; 'reply-to:addr:whitemice.org': 0.16; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'suspect': 0.25; 'received:72.14': 0.26; 'windows': 0.26; 'seeing': 0.28; 'times.': 0.30; 'mentioning': 0.30; 'sun,': 0.30; 'tool.': 0.30; 'source': 0.32; 'developers': 0.32; 'list': 0.32; 'too': 0.32; 'it.': 0.33; "i've": 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'there': 0.34; 'reasons': 0.34; "isn't": 0.35; 'stopped': 0.35; 'open': 0.37; 'some': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'could': 0.37; 'using': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'something': 0.38; 'header :Mime-Version:1': 0.39; 'happened': 0.39; 'help': 0.39; 'goes': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'bring': 0.62; 'articles': 0.69; 'anything.': 0.71; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.71; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'quality': 0.74; 'land': 0.77; 'pleasure': 0.77; 'existence.': 0.84; 'pondered': 0.84; 'subject:tool': 0.84; 'subject:there': 0.91; 'subject:good': 0.93 |
| Subject | Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python |
| From | Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org> |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Date | Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:42:11 -0400 |
| In-Reply-To | <0439d15a-d6f3-435e-a4f9-416082596480@g9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> |
| References | <0439d15a-d6f3-435e-a4f9-416082596480@g9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| X-Mailer | Evolution 3.0.2 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| Reply-To | awilliam@whitemice.org |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.872.1310345101.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 25 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1310345101 news.xs4all.nl 21880 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39475 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:9211 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 15:50 -0700, Ivan Kljaic wrote: > Ok Guys. I know that most of us have been expiriencing the need for a > nice Gui builder tool for RAD and most of us have been googling for it > a lot of times. But seriously. Why is the not even one single RAD tool > for Python. I mean what happened to boa constructor that it stopped > developing. I simply do not see any reasons why there isn't anything. > Please help me understand it. Any insights? I've pondered this myself, for a long time - since I could use RAD to build very nice applications using Borland's OWL on Windows For Workgroups.... it is sad. But Open Source land is simply too fragmented. There are too many database bindings [and RAD requires something like an ORM (think SQLalchemy)] and far too many GUI toolkits [Qt, Gtk, wx, and the list goes on and on]. Nothing can muster the gravity required to bring a quality RAD tool into existence. I also suspect - seeing some of the articles that float across the FLOSS-o-sphere mentioning "RAD" - that many Open Source developers have never had the pleasure [yes, it is a pleasure] of using a professional RAD tool.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Ivan Kljaic <ikljaic@gmail.com> - 2011-07-10 15:50 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Corey Richardson <kb1pkl@aim.com> - 2011-07-10 19:03 -0400
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python CM <cmpython@gmail.com> - 2011-07-10 16:49 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org> - 2011-07-10 20:42 -0400
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python "bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com" <bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 05:09 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-07-11 22:39 +1000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 06:44 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Thorsten Kampe <thorsten@thorstenkampe.de> - 2011-07-11 16:10 +0200
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 07:21 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Thorsten Kampe <thorsten@thorstenkampe.de> - 2011-07-11 16:38 +0200
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 00:39 +1000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 09:33 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 09:56 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 04:03 +1000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 11:52 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 05:27 +1000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-07-12 12:40 +1200
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Ivan Kljaic <ikljaic@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 11:28 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 05:16 +1000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 12:03 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 14:48 -0500
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 12:58 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 13:02 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 13:19 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 12:37 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Kevin Walzer <kw@codebykevin.com> - 2011-07-11 16:35 -0400
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 13:52 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python CM <cmpython@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 11:43 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 14:18 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python CM <cmpython@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 17:22 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-07-13 07:59 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-07-12 11:10 +1000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Speedbird <julio@techfuel.net> - 2011-07-11 09:38 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-07-12 20:24 +1000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 06:20 -0500
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 22:27 +1000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org> - 2011-07-10 20:43 -0400
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 03:47 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Anthony Papillion <papillion@gmail.com> - 2011-07-10 19:51 -0500
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 03:34 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Kevin Walzer <kw@codebykevin.com> - 2011-07-11 09:58 -0400
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2011-07-11 19:11 +0200
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python "Elias Fotinis" <efotinis@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-11 21:59 +0300
Re: Why isn't there a good RAD Gui tool for python Billy Mays <noway@nohow.com> - 2011-07-11 15:21 -0400
Re: Why isn't there a good RAD Gui tool for python Hansmeet Singh <hansmeetschool@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 20:05 -0800
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python Dave Cook <davecook@nowhere.net> - 2011-07-11 23:33 +0000
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 18:42 -0700
Re: Wgy isn't there a good RAD Gui tool fo python sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-07-11 18:38 -0700
csiph-web