Re: which async framework?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; 'example:': 0.03; 'url:pypi': 0.03; 'versions,': 0.07; '(aka': 0.09; 'parsers': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'mostly': 0.14; '(do': 0.16; 'from:addr:pitrou.net': 0.16; 'from:addr:solipsis': 0.16; 'from:name:antoine pitrou': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:which': 0.16; 'fix': 0.17; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'protocols': 0.31; 'writes:': 0.31; 'url:python': 0.33; 'framework': 0.33; 'but': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'supporting': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'url:0': 0.67; 'message-id:invalid': 0.79; 'antoine.': 0.84
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
To	python-list@python.org
From	Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net>
Subject	Re: which async framework?
Date	Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:57:38 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	sea.gmane.org
User-Agent	Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-Loom-IP	92.94.133.101 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:28.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/28.0)
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.8048.1394553484.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	20
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1394553484 news.xs4all.nl 2922 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39278
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:68218

Show key headers only | View raw

Chris Withers <chris <at> simplistix.co.uk> writes:
> 
> The protocols are all financial (do we really not have a pure-python FIX 
> library?!) but none are likely to have existing python implementations.

If you are mostly writing protocol implementations (aka parsers and
serializers), then you should consider writing them in a way that's
framework-agnostic.

See as an example:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/obelus/0.1

(if you really want to settle on a single framework and don't mind
supporting old Python versions, then I recommend asyncio)

Regards

Antoine.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: which async framework? Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> - 2014-03-11 15:57 +0000

csiph-web