Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #68218 > unrolled thread

Re: which async framework?

Started byAntoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net>
First post2014-03-11 15:57 +0000
Last post2014-03-11 15:57 +0000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python


Contents

  Re: which async framework? Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> - 2014-03-11 15:57 +0000

#68218 — Re: which async framework?

FromAntoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net>
Date2014-03-11 15:57 +0000
SubjectRe: which async framework?
Message-ID<mailman.8048.1394553484.18130.python-list@python.org>
Chris Withers <chris <at> simplistix.co.uk> writes:
> 
> The protocols are all financial (do we really not have a pure-python FIX 
> library?!) but none are likely to have existing python implementations.

If you are mostly writing protocol implementations (aka parsers and
serializers), then you should consider writing them in a way that's
framework-agnostic.

See as an example:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/obelus/0.1

(if you really want to settle on a single framework and don't mind
supporting old Python versions, then I recommend asyncio)

Regards

Antoine.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web