Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #89536
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.002 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'cpython': 0.05; 'attribute': 0.07; 'subject: + ': 0.07; 'string': 0.09; 'items)': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; "'to": 0.16; 'adjacent': 0.16; 'concat': 0.16; 'prev': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 's[1:]': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'meant': 0.20; '>>>': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'preferred': 0.22; 'this?': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'helper': 0.24; '(for': 0.26; 'skip:" 20': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'correct': 0.29; 'getting': 0.31; 'lines': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; "i'd": 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'subject:with': 0.35; 'operations': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'yield': 0.36; 'wrong': 0.37; 'so,': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'bad': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'no.': 0.61; 'simple': 0.61; 'more': 0.64; 'determine': 0.67; 'obvious': 0.74; 'characters,': 0.84; 'subject:Using': 0.84; 'yours': 0.88; 'fibonacci': 0.91; 'inefficient': 0.91 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
| Subject | Re: Using + with strings considered bad |
| Date | Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:24:51 +0200 |
| Organization | None |
| References | <878udbxrpg.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | p57bd8d27.dip0.t-ipconnect.de |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.13.3 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.20+ |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.79.1430299516.3680.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 67 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1430299516 news.xs4all.nl 2936 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:51093 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:89536 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> Because I try to keep my lines (well) below 80 characters, I use the
> following:
> print('Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize once for ' +
> str(large_fibonacci) + ' to determine speed increase')
>
> But I was told that using + with strings was bad practice. Is this
> true?
No. What was meant was probably that str.join() is preferred when you are to
concat an arbitrary number of strings, i. e.
# wrong
s = ""
for item in items:
s += " " + item.name # may be inefficient depending on implementation
s = s[1:]
# correct
s = " ".join(item.name for item in items)
(For more complex operations than just getting an attribute you may have to
write a helper generator:
def bogus(items):
prev = ""
for item in items:
yield str(len(prev) - len(item))
prev = item
s = "*".join(bogus(items))
)
> If so, what is the better way to do this?
Python concats adjacent string constants implicitly
>>> "one" "two"
'onetwo'
but in CPython an extra + will be removed by the peephole optimiser:
>>> def f(): return "one" + "two"
...
>>> import dis
>>> dis.dis(f)
1 0 LOAD_CONST 3 ('onetwo')
3 RETURN_VALUE
> print('Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize once for ' +
> str(large_fibonacci) + ' to determine speed increase')
You could write that as
print('Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize once for '
'{} to determine speed increase'.format(large_fibonacci))
but in a simple case like yours I'd go with the obvious
print(
'Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize once for',
large_fibonacci,
'to determine speed increase')
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Using + with strings considered bad Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-29 10:29 +0200
Re: Using + with strings considered bad Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-04-29 10:08 +0100
Re: Using + with strings considered bad Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-04-29 11:24 +0200
Re: Using + with strings considered bad Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-29 13:17 +0200
Re: Using + with strings considered bad Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-29 14:23 +0200
Re: Using + with strings considered bad Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-29 22:55 +1000
Re: Using + with strings considered bad Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-29 23:15 +1000
Re: Using + with strings considered bad wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2015-04-29 08:16 -0700
Re: Using + with strings considered bad Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> - 2015-04-29 06:40 -0500
csiph-web