Re: Function decorator having arguments is complicated

From	Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: Function decorator having arguments is complicated
Date	2015-04-29 21:22 +1200
Message-ID	<cqbm6bFdooeU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<mailman.31.1430102277.3680.python-list@python.org> <553de6f1$0$12905$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw

> On Monday 27 April 2015 12:37, Makoto Kuwata wrote:
> 
>>  def multiply(n):
>>    def deco(func):
>>      def newfunc(*args, **kwargs):
>>        return n * func(*args, **kwargs)
>>      return newfunc
>>    return deco

I'd like to be able to write that as

    def multiply(n)(func)(*args, **kwargs):
       return n * func(*args, **kwargs)

-- 
Greg

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Function decorator having arguments is complicated Makoto Kuwata <kwa@kuwata-lab.com> - 2015-04-27 11:37 +0900
  Re: Function decorator having arguments is complicated Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-27 17:36 +1000
    Re: Function decorator having arguments is complicated Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-04-29 21:22 +1200

csiph-web