Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #94200

Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.131
X-Spam-Level *
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.74; '*S*': 0.01; 'executed': 0.07; 'part,': 0.09; 'subject:2.7': 0.09; 'zero.': 0.09; '(unlike': 0.16; 'subject:non': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '2015': 0.20; 'am,': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'figured': 0.29; 'certain': 0.31; "can't": 0.32; 'possibly': 0.32; 'belong': 0.33; "d'aprano": 0.33; 'hell': 0.33; 'steven': 0.33; 'add': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'johnson': 0.37; 'names': 0.38; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'chance': 0.60; 'your': 0.60; 'address': 0.61; 'great': 0.63; 'talking': 0.67; 'jul': 0.72; 'about?': 0.84; 'have?': 0.84; 'to:name:python': 0.84; 'poorly': 0.93; 'rick': 0.93
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=U4suUvPG+qJZGyGTTmx499AIdLeUc08NjKRiMQhyR3Y=; b=id7Z3bz5hsh9MVuNDUDCeJL0CO/esAQTZwH36xE+1Ir2HY4+EOnZC8zjrXsv/DoTeC guVltHReeL7wgJNN3q1luDyeaO4C8DphUzjnbDRFDaKvJrmLc5SzkJzqQI/CW8VobA7G LcqAWC4tSAdYCAfS+jyuc7RCUluYkSMuMQxnA0ZnHllprotbLnmLsf0Li+yBxPjv/6w3 9b130+2xeI1tp+i69rneAgoy4SzJzS5mz21cv8rpEG+EmrfmzoRwoKbI2R/Q2KqhZL2D VmFBv0F01qQNjUo9LrH+roWzTuAoOo9EMizK6bXU9hfyEG2sMXqvUucKLMSCJesHEfyT ZP0w==
X-Received by 10.129.36.14 with SMTP id k14mr25718618ywk.64.1437363057236; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 20:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <55ac6703$0$1650$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
References <moenuj$f11$1@ger.gmane.org> <CABicbJ+Fy=Jhj63VnOmS3BJD3He+i3J+P+ASMmjJDMi9X7rt-w@mail.gmail.com> <mof14q$b47$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.713.1437313378.3674.python-list@python.org> <87y4icxh4r.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.736.1437332518.3674.python-list@python.org> <87egk3ykui.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.742.1437337734.3674.python-list@python.org> <87a8uryf2e.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.749.1437346309.3674.python-list@python.org> <87zj2rwx3g.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.753.1437352096.3674.python-list@python.org> <0abc1500-0e0b-44b3-b078-63aa51eaf5b5@googlegroups.com> <bfa7f18e-8c1e-424b-9a3d-b99ce723c856@googlegroups.com> <f6ebb2fd-fb70-4781-98ca-dac47c2f7179@googlegroups.com> <55ac6703$0$1650$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date Sun, 19 Jul 2015 21:30:17 -0600
Subject Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?
To Python <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.757.1437363060.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 16
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1437363060 news.xs4all.nl 2855 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60703
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:94200

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:35 am, Rick Johnson wrote:
>
>> I figured that was you *MARK LAWRENCE*. I shall add sock-puppeting
>> to your many egregious offenses! And poorly executed sock-puppeting
>> as well! You're a zero.
>
> Rick, what the hell are you talking about? Mark is using the same email
> address as he has always used (unlike a certain person who shall remain
> unnamed, but used to go by the names RR and Ranting Rick and possibly
> others).

Not quite; one is @yahoo.co.uk, and the other is @gmail.com. If the
great Ranting Rick can't tell that these belong to the same person
just based on the local part, then what chance do we mere mortals
have?

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 14:42 +0100
  Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-19 18:10 +0200
    Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 17:38 +0100
      Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-19 19:14 +0200
        Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 18:54 +0100
          Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 11:28 -0700
            Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? breamoreboy@gmail.com - 2015-07-19 11:44 -0700
              Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 12:13 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? breamoreboy@gmail.com - 2015-07-19 13:21 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-20 12:36 +1000
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-19 21:07 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-22 00:40 +0100
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2015-07-20 08:46 +0200
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 22:00 -0700
        Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2015-07-20 08:36 +0200
    Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 13:01 -0600
      Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 12:28 -0700
        Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? breamoreboy@gmail.com - 2015-07-19 13:36 -0700
          Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 14:27 -0700
            Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? breamoreboy@gmail.com - 2015-07-19 17:45 -0700
              Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 18:25 -0700
      Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-19 22:05 +0200
        Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 21:28 +0100
          Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-20 00:10 +0200
            Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 23:51 +0100
              Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-20 01:23 +0200
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-20 01:27 +0100
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 17:49 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? breamoreboy@gmail.com - 2015-07-19 18:26 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 18:35 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-20 13:12 +1000
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 21:30 -0600
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-20 15:59 +1000
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 20:58 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-21 18:33 +1000
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 19:58 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 23:33 -0600
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 00:39 -0600
              Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-20 12:49 +1000
      Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-20 12:32 +1000
    Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2015-07-20 08:06 +0200
    Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2015-07-20 08:10 +0200

csiph-web