Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #67421
| References | (1 earlier) <4e741358-ce12-40ac-97b8-3bbbf2d6ddca@googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmrBU9K0aoJyCUmif1FCExtbsuq27pGxiRvyNd=yVn-D5g@mail.gmail.com> <leugs1$68d$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmrmJjiGMfqui=PpJco7LjtqVpUjj=XNmTYbYQEmxG3fmw@mail.gmail.com> <leumvj$olt$1@ger.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-02 20:58 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.7566.1393754341.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Frank Millman <frank@chagford.com> wrote: > I assume by 'warm cache' you mean that I had used the decimal module before > and not switched the machine off before trying the above exercise. > > In my case, the machine was switched off before I started. I switched it on > and executed the above steps. That would be about it, yeah. So that would be a cold cache test. > To be slightly more precise, instead of 'the blink of an eye', I estimate it > was between 250-500 ms. If I close the interpreter and start it up again, it > takes maybe 100-200ms. Alright, so now we're talking about some other factors on my system that slow down the cold cache load dramatically. That I can completely understand; when I originally posted it, I was fully aware that the exact figures wouldn't be duplicable. 500ms is a major delay to startup; but what's really significant is the 100-200ms warm cache, because that one is what's going to be repeated. (Imagine a web server that periodically restarts its subprocesses - say, every N requests. Adding 200ms to startup time effectively adds 200/N ms to every request.) An awesome disk cache can improve that immensely, though. My Debian box, warm cache, takes 0.0 seconds to import decimal. But it's a faster computer overall, so even cold cache it only takes a hundred ms or so. > Just to be sure, I switched the machine off and on again, and repeated the > exercise. Starting the interpreter for the first time takes 1.5 - 2 seconds. > Importing decimal for the first time takes less than 500ms. I'm beginning to get a suspicion here that the Windows XP disk cache actually might have a "most pessimal" state, where it's full of other stuff. Worse than a cold cache in performance, a cache warmed by something else. But in any case, the exact figures for cold cache are almost immaterial compared to a noticeable warm-cache delay - if there's enough work to be done just loading the .pyc from the disk cache that it takes visible time, then it would be a problem to force that to be loaded on every interpreter startup. Which was kinda the point of my original testing - I wanted to know how much of a penalty there'd be to moving decimal to built-in. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mac vs. Linux for Python Development twiz <twizansk@gmail.com> - 2014-02-23 00:43 -0800
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-23 19:58 +1100
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development twiz <twizansk@gmail.com> - 2014-02-23 02:17 -0800
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-23 21:24 +1100
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2014-02-23 03:49 -0800
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornatskyy@live.com> - 2014-02-23 11:51 +0200
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development "Günther Dietrich" <gd.usenet@spamfence.net> - 2014-02-23 12:34 +0100
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development Dave Cook <davecook@nowhere.net> - 2014-02-24 03:37 +0000
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> - 2014-02-24 10:33 -0500
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2014-02-24 10:34 -0700
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2014-02-24 10:42 -0700
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-25 05:37 +1100
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-02-24 19:35 +0000
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-23 09:20 -0500
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development "Mark H. Harris" <harrismh777@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 14:32 -0800
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 09:57 +1100
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2014-03-01 15:07 -0800
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2014-03-02 07:51 +0200
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 17:57 +1100
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2014-03-02 09:35 +0200
Re: Mac vs. Linux for Python Development Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 20:58 +1100
csiph-web