Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #2694

Re: Python benefits over Cobra

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.01; 'bug': 0.02; 'subject:Python': 0.04; 'ubuntu': 0.04; 'wed,': 0.04; 'mess': 0.07; 'python': 0.07; 'admit': 0.09; 'exceptions,': 0.09; 'framework,': 0.09; 'frameworks.': 0.09; 'myself,': 0.09; 'tying': 0.09; 'pm,': 0.11; 'linux': 0.11; 'wrote:': 0.14; '(is': 0.16; '.net.': 0.16; '64-bit,': 0.16; 'devs': 0.16; 'forking': 0.16; 'hypothetical': 0.16; 'incompatible': 0.16; 'stuck.': 0.16; 'opinion': 0.16; 'idle': 0.19; 'code,': 0.20; 'language': 0.20; 'code': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; '(and': 0.22; 'breaks': 0.23; 'received:209.85.214.174': 0.23; 'received:mail- iw0-f174.google.com': 0.23; 'fix': 0.24; 'version': 0.25; '.net': 0.25; 'windows': 0.26; 'chris': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'bugs': 0.29; 'probably': 0.30; 'least': 0.30; "won't": 0.30; 'compiling': 0.31; 'microsoft,': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; 'source': 0.32; 'done': 0.32; 'option': 0.33; 'words,': 0.33; 'actually': 0.34; 'change': 0.34; 'requires': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'that,': 0.35; 'open': 0.35; 'question': 0.35; 'running': 0.36; 'systems,': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'some': 0.37; 'case': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'either': 0.37; 'run': 0.37; '(to': 0.38; 'apr': 0.38; 'hardware': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'completely': 0.38; 'much.': 0.39; 'received:209.85.214': 0.39; 'though,': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'said': 0.39; 'whatever': 0.39; "it's": 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'care.': 0.60; 'laptops': 0.60; 'happen': 0.61; 'design': 0.61; '2011': 0.62; 'perfectly': 0.65; 'yourself': 0.66; 'intend': 0.68; 'heavy': 0.69; 'proud': 0.72; 'risk': 0.75; 'ship': 0.77; '(let': 0.84; 'bias': 0.84; 'forever': 0.84; 'subject:over': 0.84; 'trust.': 0.84; 'xp,': 0.84
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LQDGPbAAVvELD+B+h7qYTXi3jZLP4+DQYLqMFZQpnLo=; b=izcKvTbVrfuZkwaovzr5gGRKpy0erY+LmjawO1P7OCfjEqJ8diVT/wnEPKBYq2yjzZ cGS7NTK72SRUjg7uMmUj/hSYIAxGdX355w1yvlqzy+HJ3T5Nkn+/GQc1v0gQBwfKNvFJ di361uBoxGh48NC3edLWIoOUCCMOvAQefb05A=
DomainKey-Signature a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=aracXgCmbq80hAjWmpWnSHsfyYKpJhr+eDysevMPVOTf7Cu7oVUU6yPaV+CCajsbNn mKlfACgLQF4Bp46l6MPe5VwClA96+Tb5sLiI3lVg1cKOZ9HQ3LvcCj6PGKhPNKBdvqtt 2EKsDh6ANY951hs5QO9eAe4wE2IGpi0XYWZdQ=
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <t7Vmp.7632$zn.3197@newsfe19.iad>
References <mailman.65.1302065189.9059.python-list@python.org> <t7Vmp.7632$zn.3197@newsfe19.iad>
Date Wed, 6 Apr 2011 18:26:25 +1000
Subject Re: Python benefits over Cobra
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
To python-list@python.org
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.72.1302078388.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 33
NNTP-Posting-Host 82.94.164.166
X-Trace 1302078388 news.xs4all.nl 65870 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:48158
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:2694

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:03 PM, harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> wrote:
> Having said all of that, I must admit my bias against Microsoft .NET and the
> Mono frameworks. I personally cannot support a language that requires either
> one. Microsoft has made such a mess out of almost everything it has
> touched... including language design (er, lockin). Cobra patronizes this
> scheme and is therefore also evil. This is of course just an opinion (and a
> proud one I must admit).

In other words, you have a bias against non-portability.

Right now, I have around me two laptops running Windows XP, two
running Ubuntu 10.10 64-bit, and two running Ubuntu 32-bit.
(Surprisingly balanced.) With a very few exceptions, code that I write
in IDLE on one box will run perfectly on any of the others. That won't
happen in a language that requires a Microsoft framework, because it's
simply not in their interests to ship for Linux (let alone OS/2, which
I have at home). I do like me some true portability.

Even if you don't intend to move off Windows, though, there's a lot of
risk in tying yourself to a non-free framework, especially such a
heavy one as .NET. You're completely at the mercy of the provider, in
this case Microsoft, and if they make an incompatible change in the
framework, you're forever stuck. At least with open source systems,
you have the option of forking Python version whatever and compiling
it for your new hardware (is there a Python 1.0 for amd64? heh).
Hypothetical situation yes, but it's a question of trust. Do you trust
Microsoft to never have any bugs in the .NET framework? (To be honest,
I don't actually trust the Python devs *that* much. But if Python
version 3.Foo has a bug that breaks my code, I do at least have the
ability to fix it myself, if I care. Which I probably don't with
Python, but I have done with other OSS.)

Chris Angelico

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Python benefits over Cobra Brendan Simon <Brendan@BrendanSimon.com> - 2011-04-06 14:40 +1000
  Re: Python benefits over Cobra harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-06 03:03 -0500
    Re: Python benefits over Cobra Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-06 18:26 +1000
      Re: Python benefits over Cobra Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-06 12:29 +0000
        Re: Python benefits over Cobra Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-06 23:06 +1000
        [OT] Free software versus software idea patents (was: Python benefits over Cobra) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-07 07:50 +1000
          Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-07 00:03 -0500
            Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-07 07:19 +0000
              Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-07 11:33 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-04-07 17:15 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-08 05:55 +1000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-10 21:49 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-11 00:53 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-04-11 01:36 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-12 03:53 -0500
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-04-12 13:32 -0400
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 11:44 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-04-12 15:39 -0400
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-11 09:10 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-11 11:17 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-11 22:28 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-11 15:55 -0700
                Re: [even more OT than before] Arithmetic [was Free software versus software idea patents] Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-12 11:34 +0000
                Re: [even more OT than before] Arithmetic [was Free software versus software idea patents] geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 11:11 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-12 10:02 +1000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-12 03:15 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 09:54 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-14 00:35 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-13 23:36 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-14 02:22 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-04-12 13:43 -0400
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-12 23:56 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 17:05 -0700
          Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents (was: Python benefits over Cobra) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-07 07:39 +0000
            Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents (was: Python benefits over Cobra) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 18:17 +1000
              Re: Free software versus software idea patents (was: Python benefits over Cobra) flebber <flebber.crue@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 03:51 -0700
            Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-07 10:31 -0500
              Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> - 2011-04-07 11:50 -0400
              Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org> - 2011-04-07 13:55 -0400
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-07 14:37 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-08 01:30 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-08 01:37 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-09 23:55 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-10 19:04 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-11 10:18 +1000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-10 20:48 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2011-04-10 21:01 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-04-11 11:26 -0600
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-12 04:22 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 06:59 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents CM <cmpython@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 10:48 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 11:13 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 15:56 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-14 00:50 -0500
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-13 23:38 -0700
                Re: Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-14 02:29 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 13:37 -0600
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-12 23:45 +0000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-14 01:04 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 19:15 +1000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 13:51 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 15:05 -0600
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 03:31 +1000
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-08 01:41 -0500
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2011-04-08 07:14 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-04-08 09:10 -0700
                Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2011-04-09 07:45 +0100
            Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents (was: Python benefits over Cobra) Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-04-07 14:18 -0400
            Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-10 11:53 +1000
            Re: Free software versus software idea patents (was: Python benefits over Cobra) sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-04-12 09:04 -0700
      Re: Python benefits over Cobra harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-04-07 00:25 -0500
        Re: Python benefits over Cobra Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-07 06:43 +0000

csiph-web