Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #66507
| From | Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: random.sample with large weighted sample-sets? |
| Date | 2014-02-16 16:08 +1100 |
| References | <20140215224145.68c82eb4@bigbox.christie.dr> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.7036.1392527326.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> writes:
> I'm not coming up with the right keywords to find what I'm hunting.
> I'd like to randomly sample a modestly compact list with weighted
> distributions, so I might have
>
> data = (
> ("apple", 20),
> ("orange", 50),
> ("grape", 30),
> )
That's not a list, it's a tuple. I think you want a list.
When you want a sequence where each position has a semantic meaning, use
a tuple (such as ‘("apple", 20)’). Each item has a meaning *because of*
the position it's in; if the items were in a different order, they'd
mean different things.
When you want a sequence where the positions don't have a special
meaning – each item means exactly the same no matter if you change the
order – that's sometimes called a “homogeneous” sequence, and you want a
list.
So a “record” should be represented as a tuple, and a “table” of records
should be represented as a list of tuples:
records = [
("apple", 20),
("orange", 50),
("grape", 30),
]
> and I'd like to random.sample() it as if it was a 100-element list.
The implication being, I suppose, that you'd like the number in each
tuple to be a weighting for the probability of choosing that item.
For probability weightings, you should arrange for the weightings to sum
to 1 (instead of 100 in your example). Then each weighting is simply the
desired probability of that item, and those values will work with
various libraries that deal with probability.
> What am I missing? (links to relevant keywords/searches/algorithms
> welcome in lieu of actually answering in-line)
You're looking for a “probability distribution” and “weighted choice”.
Hope that helps!
--
\ “This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending |
`\ the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the |
_o__) hopes of its children.” —Dwight Eisenhower, 1953-04-16 |
Ben Finney
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: random.sample with large weighted sample-sets? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-02-16 16:08 +1100
Re: random.sample with large weighted sample-sets? duncan smith <buzzard@invalid.invalid> - 2014-02-16 16:01 +0000
Re: random.sample with large weighted sample-sets? Charles Allen <ca137tmp@earthlink.net> - 2014-02-16 10:35 -0600
Re: random.sample with large weighted sample-sets? duncan smith <buzzard@invalid.invalid> - 2014-02-16 17:38 +0000
csiph-web