Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?

Path	csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!bcyclone05.am1.xlned.com!bcyclone05.am1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<zachary.ware@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.049
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.90; 'S': 0.00; 'versions.': 0.07; 'subject:2.7': 0.09; '2.7': 0.13; '9:13': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject:non': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'sender:addr:gmail.com': 0.18; '2015': 0.20; 'to:name:python-list@python.org': 0.20; '3.x': 0.22; 'sat,': 0.23; 'patch': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'testing': 0.25; 'wonder': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'point': 0.33; 'problem': 0.33; 'idle': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'quite': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'well.': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'future': 0.60; 'respect': 0.65; 'one- time': 0.66; 'worth': 0.67; 'feeling': 0.72; 'jul': 0.72; 'writing,': 0.91
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=GClWWZCdonICiqWuj8FX13x3oX9MHoJdyo/N7KxOj5g=; b=jlDiHFyV8PV6mvisd/5BbBafHqOsPeioPCgLGtpEstDFmuEfB0JT9cXkvzVN+o7Z4E MFLkKTM3fcsHpPTP2I5RuisKbUOzdyDEc+kp8S4+ecngQ+tWAk0rQdKUW2trKGDCym71 KX/ydaUk/U4fqFCZQoG9s/6uluWNEIQ2hqJvhIxi6/wR7SfgpKTkzCOA0bWm8n4hq0k1 Gv44P8AZTwSsTyf7CTRQrxDpYHDTWGh9vma8ZL2FBh9VXaGmghegxVxPVy7xNUEcV7BJ doaGG/Xeg428UAUXVR4jLOX+j0Ti8NtTmn2vqeczB0C/fu/6LsFs8TCgeY5qJLR47eOJ dU5A==
X-Received	by 10.107.132.154 with SMTP id o26mr631380ioi.3.1437274135807; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version	1.0
Sender	zachary.ware@gmail.com
In-Reply-To	<mof14q$b47$1@ger.gmane.org>
References	<moenuj$f11$1@ger.gmane.org> <CABicbJ+Fy=Jhj63VnOmS3BJD3He+i3J+P+ASMmjJDMi9X7rt-w@mail.gmail.com> <mof14q$b47$1@ger.gmane.org>
From	Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com>
Date	Sat, 18 Jul 2015 21:48:36 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth	dPhiLaaPcG1DHPDIcI1sKEgFUJI
Subject	Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?
To	"python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.20+
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.697.1437274139.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	12
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1437274139 news.xs4all.nl 2864 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33500
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
X-Received-Bytes	3672
X-Received-Body-CRC	2676715276
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:94085

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
> I understand the general problem quite well.  But feeling that one would
> have to do a 2.7 backport after writing, editing, or reviewing a 3.x patch
> can discourage doing a review in the first place. I am at that point now
> with respect to Idle patches.

I wonder if it would be worth the significant one-time effort to port
IDLE to 2/3, so that future bugfixes/improvements don't require any
extra effort than testing them with all versions.

-- 
Zach

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 21:48 -0500

csiph-web