Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #94085 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-18 21:48 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-07-18 21:48 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 21:48 -0500
| From | Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-18 21:48 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.697.1437274139.3674.python-list@python.org> |
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote: > I understand the general problem quite well. But feeling that one would > have to do a 2.7 backport after writing, editing, or reviewing a 3.x patch > can discourage doing a review in the first place. I am at that point now > with respect to Idle patches. I wonder if it would be worth the significant one-time effort to port IDLE to 2/3, so that future bugfixes/improvements don't require any extra effort than testing them with all versions. -- Zach
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web