Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #94085 > unrolled thread

Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?

Started byZachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com>
First post2015-07-18 21:48 -0500
Last post2015-07-18 21:48 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 21:48 -0500

#94085 — Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?

FromZachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com>
Date2015-07-18 21:48 -0500
SubjectRe: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?
Message-ID<mailman.697.1437274139.3674.python-list@python.org>
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
> I understand the general problem quite well.  But feeling that one would
> have to do a 2.7 backport after writing, editing, or reviewing a 3.x patch
> can discourage doing a review in the first place. I am at that point now
> with respect to Idle patches.

I wonder if it would be worth the significant one-time effort to port
IDLE to 2/3, so that future bugfixes/improvements don't require any
extra effort than testing them with all versions.

-- 
Zach

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web