Re: Using virtualenv to bypass sudoer issues

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<prvs=1113b28d4=jeanmichel@sequans.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	UNSURE 0.209
X-Spam-Level	**
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.60; 'S': 0.02; 'scripts': 0.03; 'though:': 0.07; 'subject:virtualenv': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; '"python': 0.16; ':-/': 0.16; 'before.': 0.16; 'virtualenv.': 0.16; 'shell': 0.22; 'looks': 0.24; 'distribute': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; "i'm": 0.30; 'getting': 0.31; 'team.': 0.31; 'remotely': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'compatible': 0.32; 'stuff': 0.32; "we're": 0.32; 'doing': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'virtual': 0.37; 'remote': 0.38; 'thank': 0.38; 'handle': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'you.': 0.62; 'back': 0.62; 'information': 0.63; 'received:194': 0.64; 'afraid': 0.65; 'within': 0.65; 'notice:': 0.67; 'person,': 0.68; 'privileged.': 0.69; 'disclose': 0.74; 'activated': 0.84; 'env': 0.84; 'execution.': 0.84; 'level"': 0.84; 'subject:Using': 0.84; 'hate': 0.91; 'medium.': 0.91
X-IronPort-AV	E=Sophos;i="4.95,816,1384297200"; d="scan'208";a="2431624"
X-Virus-Scanned	amavisd-new at zimbra.sequans.com
Date	Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:06:31 +0100 (CET)
From	Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com>
To	python-list@python.org
In-Reply-To	<qotsirtznhn.fsf@ruuvi.it.helsinki.fi>
Subject	Re: Using virtualenv to bypass sudoer issues
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Mailer	Zimbra 7.2.4_GA_2900 (ZimbraWebClient - GC32 (Win)/7.2.4_GA_2900)
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	base64
X-Mailman-Approved-At	Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:25:00 +0100
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.6617.1392027901.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	21
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1392027901 news.xs4all.nl 2879 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38384
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:65805

Show key headers only | View raw

Thank you all for you insights.

I'll probably go with virtualenv, I'll be able to distribute it among the team.
There's still one point worrying me though:
We're doing a lot a remote execution. We're using "execnet" http://codespeak.net/execnet/, and I'm not sure it can be compatible with virtualenv. execnet working at the "python level" I don't see how I can execute shell stuff before.

I had a look at fabric http://docs.fabfile.org/en/1.8/, and it looks like it can handle virtual env (anyone confirm?).

Has someone already successfully remotely activated a venv then execute a python scripts within that env, getting back the stdout/stderr ?

I'm afraid right now that switching to venv would mean switching from execnet to fabric as well (I hate redoing stuff that works :-/ ).

JM  


-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: 

The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Using virtualenv to bypass sudoer issues Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2014-02-10 11:06 +0100
  Re: Using virtualenv to bypass sudoer issues Pete Forman <petef4+usenet@gmail.com> - 2014-02-10 14:23 +0000

csiph-web