Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #65816

Re: Using virtualenv to bypass sudoer issues

Show all headers | View raw

Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> writes:

> Thank you all for you insights.
>
> I'll probably go with virtualenv, I'll be able to distribute it among
> the team.
> There's still one point worrying me though:
> We're doing a lot a remote execution. We're using "execnet"
> http://codespeak.net/execnet/, and I'm not sure it can be compatible
> with virtualenv. execnet working at the "python level" I don't see how
> I can execute shell stuff before.
>
> I had a look at fabric http://docs.fabfile.org/en/1.8/, and it looks
> like it can handle virtual env (anyone confirm?).
>
> Has someone already successfully remotely activated a venv then
> execute a python scripts within that env, getting back the
> stdout/stderr ?
>
> I'm afraid right now that switching to venv would mean switching from
> execnet to fabric as well (I hate redoing stuff that works :-/ ).

Call the venv version of python and activation is handled.
E.g. in a fabfile

    myenv/bin/python myscript.py

-- 
Pete Forman

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Using virtualenv to bypass sudoer issues Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2014-02-10 11:06 +0100
  Re: Using virtualenv to bypass sudoer issues Pete Forman <petef4+usenet@gmail.com> - 2014-02-10 14:23 +0000

csiph-web