Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #29096

Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work?

Return-Path <dwightdhutto@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'context': 0.05; 'completeness': 0.07; 'present,': 0.07; 'referring': 0.07; 'responding': 0.07; 'seemed': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'docs.': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'lookup': 0.09; 'lost.': 0.09; 'received:mail- vb0-f46.google.com': 0.09; 'referenced': 0.09; 'respond.': 0.09; 'sep': 0.09; 'through.': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'contribute': 0.10; 'archive': 0.11; 'thread': 0.11; 'useful,': 0.13; 'compatible,': 0.16; 'disclaimers': 0.16; 'disclaimers,': 0.16; 'securities,': 0.16; 'summarize,': 0.16; 'url:disclosures': 0.16; 'url:jpmorgan': 0.16; 'wed,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'thu,': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'received:209.85.212.46': 0.18; 'windows': 0.19; 'putting': 0.20; 'question.': 0.20; 'do.': 0.21; 'context.': 0.22; 'help.': 0.22; "i'd": 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'mention': 0.23; 'posts': 0.23; 'references': 0.23; 'to:2**1': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'developers': 0.26; 'leave': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'guess': 0.27; 'topic': 0.27; 'accuracy': 0.27; 'see,': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'there.': 0.28; 'received:209.85.212': 0.28; 'noticed': 0.28; 'about.': 0.29; 'argue': 0.29; 'context,': 0.29; 'finds': 0.29; 'helpful.': 0.29; 'informative': 0.29; 'url:mailman': 0.29; 'probably': 0.29; 'this.': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'related': 0.30; 'usually': 0.30; 'figure': 0.30; 'on,': 0.30; 'point': 0.31; 'asking': 0.32; 'url:python': 0.32; 'google,': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'url:listinfo': 0.32; 'goes': 0.33; 'everyone.': 0.33; 'everyone': 0.33; 'themselves': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; 'agree': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'text': 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'feed': 0.35; 'problem,': 0.35; 'especially': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'sometimes': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; "won't": 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; '12,': 0.36; "wasn't": 0.36; 'useful': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'problems': 0.36; 'possible': 0.37; 'signature': 0.37; 'does': 0.37; 'resources': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'previous': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'far': 0.37; 'well.': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'delete': 0.38; 'back': 0.62; 'time,': 0.62; 'referred': 0.62; 'information,': 0.63; 'url:email': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'show': 0.63; 'legal': 0.65; 'subject': 0.66; 'e-mail,': 0.66; 'talking': 0.66; 'response.': 0.67; 'purchase': 0.67; 'believe': 0.69; 'overcome': 0.71; 'attention': 0.75; 'saw': 0.75; 'sale': 0.76; 'absolutely': 0.84; 'about,': 0.84; 'anywhere.': 0.84; 'everything.': 0.84; 'offline,': 0.84; 'researching': 0.84; 'taken.': 0.84; 'conversation': 0.91; 'transactions': 0.91; 'clips': 0.93; 'response,': 0.93; 'responses': 0.93
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NNwcOcOUphV7e+pD/n8cMFnIuvB8kyK4eca9zRr7zGI=; b=TBy1DPtsgQC3p1Yp2hSzhoWcUL+lj5VuZe8rwtD/zLGGz2iLNqUblMIDljlTvwSA5C 9WF68t2vSTq2bdKPlYYc5jWT2bxFusZ9vNkNjCw9huknyCt2pO51Sqn33eY/fid1quD/ 8TBepC5h0PfrDKfYLB1XTY8SpM49dUY1teZwgvkkxH7wTXL59zcQQ2NEjYOpJ5acEEYR 2GrzUOEb1wm9GlSZvrcdPU6kV0X4Ckeg5/7wtWsxf4nd30E3DE84NuZmQ7EFNm1KWLzu 4g85QbYqouQUAXF1urB7IKtl53OYC59N7NnOtUmgOzrSUjUDDLf/J7MptjzbNu1/iLoQ he/w==
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <CA+vVgJUJHP3XS2oSRgru6LeUiT+qddO3dcKWLufUtRnui+uq2w@mail.gmail.com>
References <af4c9164-238f-4a94-8ed1-7c767f8c51bf@googlegroups.com> <k2para$298$1@ger.gmane.org> <CA+vVgJVgPVMNWYEQjVhj0zGko9ztjeaXdSQ-J19Xaqsn0-vCUg@mail.gmail.com> <k2pe2q$rul$1@ger.gmane.org> <CA+vVgJWesP_O1SgSt7qCAV-NshQH7-omQH+oiLFYw9nXtx+q0w@mail.gmail.com> <5B80DD153D7D744689F57F4FB69AF47416678FC5@SCACMX008.exchad.jpmchase.net> <CA+vVgJUJHP3XS2oSRgru6LeUiT+qddO3dcKWLufUtRnui+uq2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:14:28 -0400
Subject Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work?
From Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com>
To "nature\"Prasad, Ramit\"" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.656.1347585271.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 120
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1347585271 news.xs4all.nl 6865 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46248
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.stben.net!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:29096

Show key headers only | View raw


On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Prasad, Ramit
> <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> wrote:
>> Dwight Hutto wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>  Others would be able to see this for themselves but
>>> > you insist on sending email without context.  Please don't do this.
>>>
>>> How are my emails without context? I'm referring the OP to the docs,
>>> as well as posts related to their question. It goes to use google, and
>>> RTFM, and putting it politely to them.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I have noticed that you do not always quote what you are talking about.
>> Sometimes I can guess or look at another message and see what you
>> are talking about, but not always. This list philosophy seems to be
>>  "quote what is relevant and trim what is not". Not on a
>> "go lookup the previous message to find context".
>>
>>> I could summarize, but they have to do the real reading. I'm not
>>> researching this, and if I was, I'd charge for the time. This is to
>>> show that things can get complex if you don't use google, or read the
>>> docs.
>>
>>
>> Context is not the same as explaining absolutely everything.
>> It means that I, the reader, can see *what* you are talking about
>> and what you are responding *to*.
>>
>> I do agree with the stance not to spoon feed OP(s).
>>
>>>
>>> Why does the OP keep asking here, when there are answers out there.
>>> especiThey would still need to process transactions like cash while offline, and they would also need access to their inventory.ally on the pywin list, which Windows users are usually referred
>>> to.
>>
>> I was not aware that Windows users were "usually" referred anywhere.
>> Most referrals are on a case-by-case basis as many problems or
>> questions from Windows Python developers are Python questions and
>> not specific to pywin.
>>
>>>
>>> Please point out what's out of context. The links and references place
>>> it into context if the OP finds them useful, and I believe I searched
>>> well for them.
>>>
>>> Would the OP like to tell me I wasn't helpful? Because now they're
>>> probably on a search to figure out how to make these compatible, which
>>> means more questions, and more reading.
>>
>> Nobody is claiming you are not helpful. I appreciate your effort,
>> I just do not always know what is going on in a thread especially
>> if I see the thread jump to something I can contribute to but now have
>> no context with which to help. Not to mention that the archive for
>> this list is searchable. Your answer is much more useful for future
>> searchers if you leave some context for someone reading this.
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>
>>> Let's not argue about this, I was pointing them to what I saw as the
>>> best possible resources to overcome his current problem, and it was
>>> all in context of the conversation as far as I'm concerned.
>>>
>>
>> It is in context of the "thread", but the context of the
>> "conversation" was lost.
>>
>>
>> This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
>> conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
>> securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
>> confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
>> available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
>> --
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
> Your point is taken. Most of the time, if it's in an in line response
> I would write the email line by line, with the referenced text shown
> above my response.
>
> However, when it seems like a conversation, I just trim the above, and
> respond. That's how I view an e-mail, like an ongoing conversation.
>
> From now on, I'll leave the mailing I'm responding to above, and
> delete the point's I'm not talking about, which is about what I
> usually do.
>
> So being attacked about no context(which was an attack out of context,
> based on a few messages one night), when the whole conversation is in
> the topic reader/gmail/etc seemed a little ignorant to reading
> through. All he had to do was look back up to the email s just above
> my response, and see, or read just through mine, not read everyone.
>
> But anyway, I'll be more informative as to exactly what I was
> referencing, instead of treating it like an ongoing conversation where
> everyone was present, and paying attention to the whole of the topic.
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> David Hutto
> CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com

And if you look at the above in gmail, you can see the ...'s that when
not clicked, won't show some of the responses I leave just above, and
it clips my signature line as well.

-- 
Best Regards,
David Hutto
CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Jayden <jayden.shui@gmail.com> - 2012-09-11 21:02 -0700
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Marco Nawijn <nawijn@gmail.com> - 2012-09-11 21:42 -0700
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-12 07:41 +0100
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-12 08:37 +0100
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 04:12 -0400
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? jelle <jelleferinga@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 08:12 -0700
    Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Jayden <jayden.shui@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 10:03 -0700
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-09-12 16:58 -0400
  RE: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-09-13 23:26 +0000
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-13 21:11 -0400
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-13 21:14 -0400
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-09-13 22:55 -0400
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 17:30 +1000
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 03:49 -0400
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 18:15 +1000
  RE: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-09-14 22:51 +0000
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 23:47 -0400
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-09-15 13:53 +1000
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-15 00:40 -0400
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-09-15 18:26 +0100
  Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-17 02:44 -0400
  BDFL Rossenbom, was Re: pythonOCC examples doesn't work? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-09-17 09:24 +0200

csiph-web