Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #108761

Re: Quote of the day

From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Quote of the day
Date 2016-05-18 22:32 +1000
Message-ID <mailman.6.1463574743.27390.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <87twhxf5nl.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <AC4F77FB-296C-4483-A8D0-AC6BEBFA4F6C@gmail.com> <mailman.50.1463481565.19823.python-list@python.org> <nhhlr4$s2$1@news.albasani.net> <CAPTjJmpccn=EXesxqpBUq-2wWoUHbvbte-axXw0qUkhHMmoFsA@mail.gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Thomas Mlynarczyk
<thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> wrote:
> On 17/05/16 12:39, Cem Karan wrote:
>> Just downloaded and used a library that came with unit tests, which all passed.
>> [...]
>> I discovered they had commented out the bodies of some of the unit
> tests...
>
> Shouldn't the unit test framework have those "empty" tests reported as
> "todo"/"incomplete" or whatever? (I know that PHPUnit reports such tests
> as "passed" which I find utterly wrong.)

In Python, the unittest framework allows you to 'skip' tests for any
reason. That would be the best.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Quote of the day Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-05-17 17:50 +1000
  Re: Quote of the day Radek Holý <Radek1@holych.org> - 2016-05-17 10:12 +0200
    Re: Quote of the day Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-05-17 11:30 +0300
      Re: Quote of the day Sivan Greenberg <sivan@vitakka.co> - 2016-05-17 11:53 +0300
      Re: Quote of the day Paul Rudin <paul.nospam@rudin.co.uk> - 2016-05-17 10:54 +0100
        Re: Quote of the day Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 20:48 +1000
        Re: Quote of the day Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-05-17 15:21 +0300
          Re: Quote of the day wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2016-05-17 06:15 -0700
            Re: Quote of the day wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2016-05-18 23:50 -0700
          Re: Quote of the day Paul Rudin <paul.nospam@rudin.co.uk> - 2016-05-17 15:27 +0100
            Re: Quote of the day Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 13:42 -0600
              Re: Quote of the day Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-05-17 23:21 +0300
      Re: Quote of the day Cem Karan <cfkaran2@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 06:39 -0400
        Re: Quote of the day Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2016-05-18 14:05 +0200
          Re: Quote of the day Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-18 22:32 +1000
          Re: Quote of the day Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-05-18 08:21 -0700
            Re: Quote of the day Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2016-05-18 17:35 +0200
              Re: Quote of the day Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-05-18 08:47 -0700
              Re: Quote of the day Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-05-18 09:05 -0700
                Re: Quote of the day Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-05-19 02:50 +1000
            Re: Quote of the day Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-05-19 10:52 +1200
              Re: Quote of the day Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-05-18 16:30 -0700
                Re: Quote of the day Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-05-19 10:43 +1000
                Re: Quote of the day Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-05-18 17:59 -0700

csiph-web