Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #108751
| From | Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Quote of the day |
| Date | 2016-05-17 23:21 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <871t5077vv.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <87mvnp57s8.fsf@rudin.co.uk> <87poskg9ip.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87inyc69qb.fsf@rudin.co.uk> <7bc71dff-5240-d9f2-c1f8-8863afc24c89@gmail.com> <mailman.67.1463514607.19823.python-list@python.org> |
Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com>: > On 05/17/2016 08:27 AM, Paul Rudin wrote: >> Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> writes: >>> That's a long time to be without a product to sell. >> >> But you do have the option of building a kernel incorporating your fix >> and using that. > > Sure as an individual end user that may be the best option. But not > necessarily for a business. Correct, the answer would be no. > The cost of doing that could be prohibitive. Really, the customer would simply refuse to do it. They are not in the business of building kernels. Also, they would immediately fall out of any kind of distro support if they improvised with their own kernel. > When I did IT professionally, our policy with regards to Linux was to > stick with existing packages from a known set of (mostly) official > channels and to discourage any installing of libraries and frameworks > from source. Allowing packages to be installed from source was just a > maintenance nightmare. RPM (or deb or whatever) brings at least a tiny > bit of stability and consistency. Exactly. Marko
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Quote of the day Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-05-17 17:50 +1000
Re: Quote of the day Radek Holý <Radek1@holych.org> - 2016-05-17 10:12 +0200
Re: Quote of the day Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-05-17 11:30 +0300
Re: Quote of the day Sivan Greenberg <sivan@vitakka.co> - 2016-05-17 11:53 +0300
Re: Quote of the day Paul Rudin <paul.nospam@rudin.co.uk> - 2016-05-17 10:54 +0100
Re: Quote of the day Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 20:48 +1000
Re: Quote of the day Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-05-17 15:21 +0300
Re: Quote of the day wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2016-05-17 06:15 -0700
Re: Quote of the day wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2016-05-18 23:50 -0700
Re: Quote of the day Paul Rudin <paul.nospam@rudin.co.uk> - 2016-05-17 15:27 +0100
Re: Quote of the day Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 13:42 -0600
Re: Quote of the day Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-05-17 23:21 +0300
Re: Quote of the day Cem Karan <cfkaran2@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 06:39 -0400
Re: Quote of the day Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2016-05-18 14:05 +0200
Re: Quote of the day Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-18 22:32 +1000
Re: Quote of the day Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-05-18 08:21 -0700
Re: Quote of the day Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2016-05-18 17:35 +0200
Re: Quote of the day Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-05-18 08:47 -0700
Re: Quote of the day Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-05-18 09:05 -0700
Re: Quote of the day Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-05-19 02:50 +1000
Re: Quote of the day Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-05-19 10:52 +1200
Re: Quote of the day Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-05-18 16:30 -0700
Re: Quote of the day Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-05-19 10:43 +1000
Re: Quote of the day Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-05-18 17:59 -0700
csiph-web