Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #64663
| From | Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: datetime as subclass of date |
| Date | 2014-01-24 17:54 +1100 |
| References | <CANc-5Uw5z84=vAMVJaCH-KCSR=1q8_zTKuspaF2zzOG9qtVu4Q@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.5913.1390515296.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-29B820.19102323012014@news.panix.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5930.1390546479.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> writes: > Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > > > Makes sense, since ‘datetime’ can do everything ‘date’ can do, and > > is conceptually a subset of the same concept. > > That's reasonable, but given that, it's weird that date(2014, 1, 23) == > datetime(2014, 1, 23) is False. You would think it should be True, in > the same way that 1 + 0j == 1 is True. Hmm. It does make sense to me that ‘datetime.date(2014, 1, 23) == datetime.datetime(2014, 1, 23)’. I can come up with rationalisations for why it isn't, but they're not satisfactory. I also don't consider it a bug, though. I'm conflicted :-) -- \ “Those who write software only for pay should go hurt some | `\ other field.” —Erik Naggum, in _gnu.misc.discuss_ | _o__) | Ben Finney
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: datetime as subclass of date Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-01-24 09:14 +1100
Re: datetime as subclass of date Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-01-23 19:10 -0500
Re: datetime as subclass of date Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-01-24 17:54 +1100
Re: datetime as subclass of date Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-01-24 10:03 -0600
csiph-web