Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #20150
| References | (3 earlier) <CAMZYqRQTPH-NC-9pL=sF0q13VYiwe-BjhPusQ_aYnaA-GcnV3A@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.5629.1328839269.27778.python-list@python.org> <afdcb636-f098-4de0-9f75-71f372fe896c@k40g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <4F3490AB.7080701@mrabarnett.plus.com> <CALwzidnD4tUtaQnTakjZw2M7=ZUB6KYLwYaTHE9H3+X5vYJ7NA@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-02-10 09:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: round down to nearest number |
| From | Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5644.1328867924.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 10 February 2012 06:21, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> (3219 + 99) // 100 * 100 >> 3300 >>>>> (3289 + 99) // 100 * 100 >> 3300 >>>>> (328678 + 99) // 100 * 100 >> 328700 >>>>> (328 + 99) // 100 * 100 >> 400 >> >> Those are all rounded up to the nearest 100 correctly. > > One thing to be aware of though is that while the "round down" formula > works interchangeably for ints and floats, the "round up" formula does > not. > >>>> (3300.5 + 99) // 100 * 100 > 3300.0 > I'm surprised I haven't seen: >>> 212 - (212 % -100) 300 Here's a function that: * rounds up and down * works for both integers and floats * is only two operations (as opposed to 3 in the solutions given above) >>> def round(n, k): ... return n - n%k ... >>> # Round down with a positive k: ... round(167, 100) 100 >>> round(-233, 100 ... ) -300 >>> # Round up with a negative k: ... round(167, -100) 200 >>> round(-233, -100) -200 >>> # Edge cases ... round(500, -100) 500 >>> round(500, 100) 500 >>> # Floats ... round(100.5, -100) 200.0 >>> round(199.5, 100) 100.0 -- Arnaud
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
round down to nearest number noydb <jenn.duerr@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 16:30 -0800
Re: round down to nearest number Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 17:47 -0700
Re: round down to nearest number noydb <jenn.duerr@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 17:23 -0800
Re: round down to nearest number Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-02-09 17:43 -0800
Re: round down to nearest number Olive <diolu@bigfoot.com> - 2012-02-10 21:56 +0100
Re: round down to nearest number Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 19:00 -0700
Re: round down to nearest number noydb <jenn.duerr@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 18:25 -0800
Re: round down to nearest number MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-02-10 03:36 +0000
Re: round down to nearest number Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 23:21 -0700
Re: round down to nearest number Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 09:58 +0000
Re: round down to nearest number noydb <jenn.duerr@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 09:23 -0800
Re: round down to nearest number Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 22:05 +1100
Re: round down to nearest number Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-02-09 22:29 -0500
Re: round down to nearest number Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xemacs.org> - 2012-02-11 11:26 +0100
Re: round down to nearest number MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-02-10 03:39 +0000
csiph-web