Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #20129
| References | <460b3d7b-d2ce-492a-ab61-ea4a1ee58198@1g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> <mailman.5623.1328834861.27778.python-list@python.org> <d7e99230-5687-4407-b998-a59cffe9833a@i18g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <CAMZYqRQTPH-NC-9pL=sF0q13VYiwe-BjhPusQ_aYnaA-GcnV3A@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2012-02-09 19:00 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: round down to nearest number |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5629.1328839269.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:23 PM, noydb <jenn.duerr@gmail.com> wrote: >> hmmm, okay. >> >> So how would you round UP always? Say the number is 3219, so you want >> 3300 returned. > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17944/how-to-round-up-the-result-of-integer-division/96921 > > Thus: (3219 + 99) // 100 > > Slight tangent: Beware negative numbers when using // or %. There's no problem with negative numbers here, as long as you actually want to round *up* or *down*, as opposed to away from zero or toward zero.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
round down to nearest number noydb <jenn.duerr@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 16:30 -0800
Re: round down to nearest number Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 17:47 -0700
Re: round down to nearest number noydb <jenn.duerr@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 17:23 -0800
Re: round down to nearest number Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-02-09 17:43 -0800
Re: round down to nearest number Olive <diolu@bigfoot.com> - 2012-02-10 21:56 +0100
Re: round down to nearest number Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 19:00 -0700
Re: round down to nearest number noydb <jenn.duerr@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 18:25 -0800
Re: round down to nearest number MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-02-10 03:36 +0000
Re: round down to nearest number Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 23:21 -0700
Re: round down to nearest number Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 09:58 +0000
Re: round down to nearest number noydb <jenn.duerr@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 09:23 -0800
Re: round down to nearest number Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 22:05 +1100
Re: round down to nearest number Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-02-09 22:29 -0500
Re: round down to nearest number Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xemacs.org> - 2012-02-11 11:26 +0100
Re: round down to nearest number MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-02-10 03:39 +0000
csiph-web