Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #92779

Re: Classic OOP in Python

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.05; 'important,': 0.07; 'invalidate': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'satisfy': 0.09; 'surrounded': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'design:': 0.16; 'fits': 0.16; 'inputs': 0.16; 'outputs': 0.16; 'parentheses': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:OOP': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'string': 0.17; 'tests.': 0.18; 'tests': 0.18; 'input': 0.18; 'language': 0.19; '(the': 0.22; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'pass': 0.22; "i've": 0.24; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'developers': 0.24; 'testing': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'idea': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'wonder': 0.27; 'least': 0.27; 'prints': 0.29; 'sure,': 0.29; 'thus,': 0.29; 'putting': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'run': 0.32; 'system,': 0.32; 'language.': 0.32; 'point': 0.33; 'another': 0.34; 'requirements': 0.34; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.35; 'really': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'project': 0.36; 'cases': 0.36; 'should': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'starting': 0.38; 'version': 0.38; 'received:org': 0.38; 'say': 0.38; 'test': 0.39; 'things': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'build': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'further': 0.60; 'your': 0.60; 'even': 0.61; 'is.': 0.63; 'great': 0.64; 'our': 0.64; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'awesome,': 0.84; 'batchelder': 0.84; 'pythonistas,': 0.84; 'subject:Classic': 0.84
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: Classic OOP in Python
Date Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:07:43 +0100
References <23b2fae3-91d5-486b-9898-78b34bee486f@googlegroups.com> <16dc8c92-50e3-4fc8-ae25-cbc5b13e8971@googlegroups.com> <87eglaqdca.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host host-78-147-183-3.as13285.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
In-Reply-To <87eglaqdca.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.564.1434575416.13271.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 46
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1434575416 news.xs4all.nl 2872 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37813
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:92779

Show key headers only | View raw

On 17/06/2015 21:39, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com>:
>
>> TDD is about writing tests as a way to design the best system, and
>> putting testing at the center of your development workflow. It works
>> great with Python even without interfaces.
>
> I wonder how great it really is. Testing is important, that's for sure,
> but to make it a dogmatic starting point of development is not that
> convincing.
>
> The way it was explained to me was that in TDD you actually don't write
> code to any requirements or design: you simply do the least to pass the
> tests. Thus, say you need to write a program that inputs a string and
> outputs the same string surrounded by parentheses (the requirement), the
> starting point might be this test case:
>
>     - run the program
>     - give it the word "hello" as input
>     - check that the program prints out "(hello)"
>
> The right TDD thing would be to satisfy the test with this program:
>
>     input()
>     print("(hello)")
>
> That *ought* to be the first version of the program until further test
> cases are added that invalidate it.
>
>
> Another interesting ism I have read about is the idea that the starting
> point of any software project should be the user manual. The developers
> should then go and build the product that fits the manual.
>
>
> Marko
>

Awesome, one of the funniest things I've read in years.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Classic OOP in Python "Jason P." <suscricions@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 12:21 -0700
  Re: Classic OOP in Python Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 14:38 -0500
  Re: Classic OOP in Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-06-17 12:44 -0700
    Re: Classic OOP in Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-06-17 23:39 +0300
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-17 22:07 +0100
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-06-17 14:14 -0700
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-18 00:33 +0200
          Re: Classic OOP in Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-06-17 15:55 -0700
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-18 11:50 +0100
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-19 01:01 +0200
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-20 23:52 +0100
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-21 10:26 +0200
      Re: Classic OOP in Python sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-06-17 14:33 -0700
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-17 22:49 +0100
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-18 00:22 +0200
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Marco Buttu <marco.buttu@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 11:00 +0200
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-18 00:09 +0200
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-17 23:27 +0100
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-06-18 08:58 +1000
        Re: Classic OOP in Python Cousin Stanley <cousinstanley@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 08:10 -0700
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-06-17 19:46 -0400
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 10:07 +1000
      Re: Classic OOP in Python "Jason P." <suscricions@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 04:24 -0700
    Re: Classic OOP in Python "Jason P." <suscricions@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 04:21 -0700
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-06-18 04:54 -0700
    Re: Classic OOP in Python "Jason P." <suscricions@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 04:22 -0700
  Re: Classic OOP in Python sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-06-17 14:16 -0700
    Re: Classic OOP in Python Fabien <fabien.maussion@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 13:03 +0200
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-06-18 14:25 +0300
      Re: Classic OOP in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 21:43 +1000

csiph-web